531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303870)
1. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
Faust BL; Speck CC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Prado D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):24-33. PubMed ID: 10287421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving medical record completion at a university hospital.
Stephens JS; Goodnight DL; Porter C; Rahr RR; Whitehead PJ
Med Rec News; 1980 Jun; 51(3):25-32. PubMed ID: 10247323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inservice education at George Washington University Medical Center.
Bloomrosen M
Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Dec; 3(2):60-71. PubMed ID: 10257684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent chart analysis and DRG assignment in a prospective payment environment.
Shlala TJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):34-40. PubMed ID: 10312715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. UAH Medical Record Department wins award: the inpatient medical record analysis program.
Kirk R
Med Rec News; 1976 Feb; 47(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10243621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Concurrent medical record analysis in a community hospital.
Lee MP
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jun; 55(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 10310655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Database applications in medical record management.
Waters K; Murphy G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1987 Jun; 7(4):18-29. PubMed ID: 10302445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical record control and the computer.
Mishelevich DJ; Kesinger G; Jasper M; Inga P; Robinson AL; Gaige W; Hudson BG; Tyler N
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10253964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Data base system relieves hospital cost headaches.
Trachtenberg BS
South Hosp; 1981; 49(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 10252555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving a medical record department: a case study.
Bertrand MM
Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 10300499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DRGs one year later.
Trussell N; Maddock V
South Hosp; 1984; 52(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 10310926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Master tracking system: internal medical record control.
Clark HS
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 10253962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to environment changes and challenges.
Neill MJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Jun; 57(6):18-21. PubMed ID: 10311544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating medical records: a joint venture.
Williams S; Buffington S
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 10286133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The delinquent medical record: new solutions to an old problem.
Adineh M; Price CR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10289702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical record department productivity standards: a case study.
Terlep M; Poli P
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10263573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics medical record department computerized systems.
Little EK
J Clin Comput; 1981; 9(5):170-4. PubMed ID: 10251455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. On-line medical record abstracting.
Bresnahan M; Cook J
Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 10246922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical record department in a Greek hospital.
Taylor BW
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Jul; 54(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 10310080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
