These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10304418)
1. Denial of staff privileges and referrals: antitrust litigation. Snyder EK Appl Radiol; 1989 Sep; 18(9):33-4. PubMed ID: 10304418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Antitrust Act applies to hospitals. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1991 Aug; 47(2):21. PubMed ID: 10112947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspective: antitrust litigation by aggrieved physicians. Hershey N Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Apr; 11(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 10132992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic credentialing and the fraud and abuse caveat. Benesch K Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):27-35. PubMed ID: 10122126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Denials of staff privileges face increased antitrust scrutiny. Jacobsen RA; Wiggins RB Health Care Manage Rev; 1992; 17(4):7-15. PubMed ID: 1428862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding antitrust liability for denial of access to resources: some safe harbors. Ettinger DA; Soltis KJ Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 10114113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers? Enders RJ Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The physician cartel--potential hospital federal antitrust liability in class-based denial of staff privileges to clinical psychologists. Rypma JA Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1991 Jul; (149):7-33. PubMed ID: 10112686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A rivalry gets ugly. Florida hospital's antitrust suit bypasses state, federal regulators. Hallam K Mod Healthc; 1998 May; 28(19):41-2. PubMed ID: 10180460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust challenges by allied health care professionals involving hospital staff privileges. Sfikas PM J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Dec; 24(12):361-69, 374. PubMed ID: 10115233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process. Hammack JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. High court broadens antitrust risks. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1991 Jun; 21(22):3. PubMed ID: 10110771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Restraint of trade implications for nurse practitioners: denial of hospital admitting or staff privileges. Timmons G; Ridenour N J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1993; 5(4):175-8. PubMed ID: 8398426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Third Circuit allows physician's federal antitrust suit to be tried. Hosp Law Newsl; 1996 Oct; 13(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 10161769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Summary judgment against physician in antitrust litigation reversed. Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc. Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Sep; 17(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 11186480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Curtailing medical staff privileges: a case study. Kaminski K QRC Advis; 1997 Mar; 13(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 10164985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of medical staff using fiscal factors: economic credentialing. Blum JD J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Mar; 26(3):65-72, 82. PubMed ID: 10127073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital's denial of privileges does not violate antitrust act. Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jan; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 10278108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Austin decision good news for peer reviewers. Hudson T Hospitals; 1993 Jan; 67(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 8419281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]