138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10304449)
1. Iowa Methodist Hospital saves space and money with in-house microfilm system.
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Aug; 51(4):82-4. PubMed ID: 10304449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of microfilming.
Holmes K; Harley R
Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Jun; 20(6):41-2, 45, 47. PubMed ID: 10308203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PCOM's microfilm project saves valuable space.
OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Outside transcription services: a cost-effective alternative to in-house word processing.
Demster G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 10262553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Microfilm saves hospital from storage crisis.
AMRO; 1988 Aug; 29(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 10293119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective payment system.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How microfilming eases handling of medical records.
Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Aug; 18(8):38. PubMed ID: 10241917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Word processing eliminates use of outside transcription service.
Kahl K; Vlazny J; Casey D
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 10249004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hawaii Microfilm helps pioneer use of micrographics in Aloha State.
Turpin J
J Inf Image Manage; 1986 Jun; 19(6):22-5. PubMed ID: 10277648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis as applied to contract transcription service.
Slade D
Top Health Rec Manage; 1980 Sep; 1(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 10309404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contract transcription services--cost containment decision.
Stromgren B
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):79-83. PubMed ID: 10249005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Productivity study pays big dividends.
Schumann RH; Sanderson RC; White CA
Hospitals; 1980 Sep; 54(18):80, 81-2. PubMed ID: 7399463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microfilm: helping to save space and keep staff.
Hosp Equip Supplies; 1976 Jan; 22(1):6. PubMed ID: 10243028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Popularity of word processing spreads from medical records to other units.
Cost Containment; 1981 Jul; 3(14):7. PubMed ID: 10251923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient and effective abstracting: patient information reporting system is the answer.
Copeland B
Comput Hosp; 1981; 2(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 10253389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Obtaining a grant: a collaborative effort.
Pavoni MM; Noorani Z
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1987 Jul; 58(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10282653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcription incentive plan.
Picukaric JM
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):84-90. PubMed ID: 10304451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Centralized word processing: a cost-containment measure.
Johnson GH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1980 Sep; 1(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 10309403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are you in control?
Murtagh P
J Microgr; 1981 Feb; 14(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 10249783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to know when to switch to microfilm.
Rymer JE
OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 10246430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
