These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10304719)
1. Peer review: inter-reviewer agreement during evaluation of research grant applications. Wiener SL; Urivetzky M; Bregman D; Cohen J; Eich R; Gootman N; Gulotta S; Taylor B; Tuttle R; Webb W; Wright J Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10304719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of health services research grant applications. McFall D Inquiry; 1978 Sep; 15(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 151070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review: a simplified approach. Russell AS; Thorn BD; Grace M J Rheumatol; 1983 Jun; 10(3):479-81. PubMed ID: 6887172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications. Mayo NE; Brophy J; Goldberg MS; Klein MB; Miller S; Platt RW; Ritchie J J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 16828678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short cuts for peer review. McDuffie FC J Rheumatol; 1983 Jun; 10(3):358-9. PubMed ID: 6887159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control of epidemiological lectures online: scientific evaluation of peer review. Linkov F; Lovalekar M; LaPorte R Croat Med J; 2007 Apr; 48(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 17436390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staying on the mark: a review of grant evaluation. Doermann H Found News; 1982; 23(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 10255511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is peer review in crisis? Mulligan A Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Expressing our inner thoughts: how to organize and write a clinical research project grant application. Koopman WJ J Rheumatol Suppl; 1992 Apr; 33():16-9. PubMed ID: 1593596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mentors could support a student reviewer database. Pernetta AP Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7150):129. PubMed ID: 17625541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective influences in the grant review process. Mackenzie RS; Martin RE J Dent Educ; 1986 Dec; 50(12):726-7. PubMed ID: 3465776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-evaluation and peer review--an example of action research in promoting self-determination of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Löfman P; Pietilä AM; Häggman-Laitila A J Clin Nurs; 2007 Mar; 16(3A):84-94. PubMed ID: 17518873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HRSA goes triad: an update on the training grant review process. Moser SE; Walling A Fam Med; 2002 Oct; 34(9):694-5. PubMed ID: 12455256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective. Bonetta L Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review. Post J Bull N Y Acad Med; 1975 Jun; 51(6):754-9. PubMed ID: 1055624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The grant application: making yours stand out across the review cycle. Hurley AC; Wells N Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S120-2. PubMed ID: 10369532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review and scientific method in clinical research. Morgan PP Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 7459784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National Institutes of Health: the lottery. Heilman KM Ann Neurol; 2007 Jul; 62(1):106. PubMed ID: 17474112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]