226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10304844)
1. Six states mandate HMO dual choice for employees.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):40. PubMed ID: 10304844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed amendments to HMO dual choice rules.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1979 Sep; 34(3):12-3, 99. PubMed ID: 10277981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HMOs' federal mandate may face legal challenge.
Mod Healthc; 1980 Jun; 10(6):38. PubMed ID: 10247371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health maintenance organizations; employees' health benefits plans--final regulation.
Fed Regist; 1979 Jul; 44(139):42081-91. PubMed ID: 10242799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Maintenance Organizations: employees' health benefits plan.
Fed Regist; 1978 Apr; 43(80):17681-7. PubMed ID: 10307346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Borden's stance challenges HMO law.
Emmrich S
Bus Insur; 1980 Apr; 14(17):14, 36. PubMed ID: 10246092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Howard Veit: ERISA does not block HMO development.
Veit HR
Mod Healthc; 1978 Oct; 8(10):66. PubMed ID: 151213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HMO-employer contracts.
Krasner W
Group Health J; 1983; 4(2):16-23. PubMed ID: 10262250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Public Health Service--Health maintenance organizations; employees' health benefits plans. Final regulations.
Fed Regist; 1980 Oct; 45(213):72512-22. PubMed ID: 10248825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Employers suffer sickly effects from government's HMO treatment.
Keene KK
Bus Insur; 1979 Oct; 13(21):41, 43. PubMed ID: 10243805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court says ERISA law supercedes HMO act.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1978 Jun; 8(6):48, 51. PubMed ID: 148584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ERISA: protection for the HMO industry against bad faith claims.
Bacon DL; Miles DE
GHAA J; 1988; 9(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 10291737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the HMO Act and what is its impact on employers?
Sloan A
Employee Relat Law J; 1979; 4(4):608-12. PubMed ID: 10294900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health maintenance organizations; procedures for enforcement of employer compliance.
Fed Regist; 1979 May; 44(105):31046-7. PubMed ID: 10241577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Minnesota sets minimum standards for health insurance plans; mandates HMO dual-choice clause.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Jun; 30(12):44-5. PubMed ID: 1037553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed dual choice regs finally issued; most important (and controversial) part of HMO Act.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Apr; 29(10):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10277965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed regs on dual choice provision of HMO Act elicit a wide variety of responses and comments.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Jun; 29(12):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10277970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HMOs: another step forward in law and business.
Warner JP
Pers J; 1988 Jan; 67(1):30, 33. PubMed ID: 10285529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HMOs not regulated in all states; NAIC develops uniform model law.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1978 Mar; 32(9):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10306670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DOL and HEW staffs consider how ERISA affects HMOs.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Jul; 32(1):81. PubMed ID: 10304828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
