These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10306127)
1. Birth-defective infants: a standard for nontreatment decisions. MacMillan ES Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 30(3):599-633. PubMed ID: 10306127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Letting defective babies die: who decides? Ellis TS Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):393-423. PubMed ID: 7102678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal problems of medical practice; withholding treatment from defective newborns. Taub S Law Med Health Care; 1982 Feb; 10(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 6917002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Defective children, their parents, and the death decision. Nolan-Haley JM J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Jan; 4(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1082475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective. Ackerman JW; Pope MC J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dilemma in Danville. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Oct; 11(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 7309501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Care of critically ill newborns. The Israeli experience. Eidelman AI J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 7636405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal side. "Do not feed...". Cushing M Am J Nurs; 1983 Apr; 83(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 6551143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience. Merrick JC J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns. Lynch JJ QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment. Horan DJ; Grant ER J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Treating defective newborns: who decides? On what basis? Boyle JM Hosp Prog; 1982 Aug; 63(8):34-7, 61. PubMed ID: 10256256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective treatment decisions and the legal rights of very young infants. Petersen KA Med J Aust; 1994 Mar; 160(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 8133824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When is it justifiable not to treat? Weir RF Second Opin; 1986; (2):42-61. PubMed ID: 10281523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics to axes: a response to dilemmas in the nursery. Diamond JM New Physician; 1978 Jul; 27(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10308499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma. Shapiro RS Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Blanket decisions on ethical issues not made. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Jan; 28(1):29. PubMed ID: 11653616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues. Robertson JA J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]