222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10306138)
1. Productivity measurement for word processing.
Franceschi HJ
Office; 1978 Feb; 87(2):86, 91, 112-3. PubMed ID: 10306138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The word processor--a transcription quality assurance mechanism.
Rotwein S
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1981 Jun; 52(3):70-4. PubMed ID: 10251776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Word processing: a key to increased productivity in medical record departments.
Dennis A
Tex Hosp; 1982 Oct; 38(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 10257728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A quality assurance program in action.
Ladwig JP
Med Rec News; 1979 Apr; 50(2):13, 22-7, 30-4. PubMed ID: 10241439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Practice forum--developing productivity standards.
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Nov; 56(11):26. PubMed ID: 10274537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Employee level productivity reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):34-40. PubMed ID: 10292963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical record productivity standards: one hospital's response.
Ladwig JP
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Sep; 5(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10268135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation of a productivity monitoring system.
Oertley K; Geryk K
Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Sep; 6(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10272561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining productivity management standards and scheduling.
Wodrich J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):21-4. PubMed ID: 10280222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The integration of quality assurance and productivity monitoring: a case study.
Peters RL; Frischkorn AE
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 10268841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of productivity standards for medical record departments.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):20-6. PubMed ID: 10318194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Attributes of healthcare productivity standards.
Kahl K; Krajnak G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 May; 57(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 10276716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing coding errors in medical records.
Tucker J
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Nov; 3(11):156-7. PubMed ID: 10239218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Audits provide quality control tools for medical record departments.
Berry CJ
Times; 1978; 19(8):8-9. PubMed ID: 10238435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Case study: a new focus--removing barriers and building teamwork to better serve medical records customers.
Feather H
Top Health Rec Manage; 1990 Jun; 10(4):41-7. PubMed ID: 10104772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Departmental productivity measurement/reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 10292375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cutting the paper chase: streamlining of medical document processing.
Sierra PL; Lach J
J Inf Image Manage; 1986 Sep; 19(9):34-7. PubMed ID: 10279035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ohio's Children's Hospital takes step-by-step approach to office automation.
Williams SW; Schaeffer GE
Comput Hosp; 1982; 3(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 10253741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Don't work harder, work smarter!
Kloss LL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Jan; 56(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10269419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditing your way to efficiency.
Turner GP; Mapa J
Hosp Adm Can; 1977 Sep; 19(9):34-5, 38. PubMed ID: 10241991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
