These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10306159)

  • 1. Let's review fee-for-service.
    Radcliffe RW
    Can Doct; 1978 Feb; 44(2):25-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10306159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practice patterns and billing patterns: let's be frank.
    Wright CJ
    CMAJ; 1998 Mar; 158(6):760-1. PubMed ID: 9538855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No remuneration for telephone renewals.
    McGregor M
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Jun; 44():1229-31. PubMed ID: 9640509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. User fees for health services. Norwegian perspective on copayments.
    Ostbye T; Hunskaar S
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Nov; 42():2109-13, 2120-5. PubMed ID: 8939310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fee for service. It's time to finish Medicare's job.
    Conway JF
    CPJ; 1989 Nov; 122(11):590-1. PubMed ID: 10296523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canada: higher fees, lower wages.
    Fairfax M
    Health PAC Bull; 1982; 13(4):11-16, 27-31. PubMed ID: 10257920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User fees if necessary but not necessarily user fees: CFPC.
    Rich P
    CMAJ; 2001 Nov; 165(11):1526. PubMed ID: 11762584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future for new MDs.
    Tavenor T
    CMAJ; 1993 Nov; 149(9):1225. PubMed ID: 8221467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 1983 presidential valediction.
    Baltzan M
    Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Nov; 129(10):1133-4. PubMed ID: 6627174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extra-billing: your right or privilege?
    LeBourdais E
    Can Doct; 1984 Apr; 50(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 10266089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Quebec Medicare really a model for Canada?
    Coffey JE
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Jun; 130(12):1602-4. PubMed ID: 6733635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New Zealand and Canadian health care systems.
    Aitken TR
    CMAJ; 1993 Nov; 149(10):1372-3. PubMed ID: 8221412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Zealand and Canadian health care systems.
    Gattey K
    CMAJ; 1993 Nov; 149(10):1373. PubMed ID: 8305022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canada's MDs embittered by health plan.
    Med World News; 1979 Feb; 20(3):23. PubMed ID: 10240205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impacts of fee reform show a mixed picture. Only some family practitioners can be satisfied].
    Fischer N
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Aug; 151(34-35):10. PubMed ID: 19771778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Good and bad in Canada.
    Gruneir R
    CMAJ; 1994 May; 150(9):1380-1. PubMed ID: 8167998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Risk structure compensation and chronic patient program. Massive fee compensation loss for many colleagues?].
    Jentsch P
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Dec; 143(49-50):46-7. PubMed ID: 11808450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Capitation fees for general practitioners, case fees for specialists].
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Jan; 148(4):50-1. PubMed ID: 16502802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis by specialist groups and federal states. Silent winners, noisy losers--the crux of the fee reform].
    Laschet H
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Aug; 151(34-35):11. PubMed ID: 19771779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of medical fee in Japan].
    Tsurumaru M
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jul; 107(4):161-2. PubMed ID: 16878405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.