These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10306195)

  • 1. Management company officials comment on operation of scanners.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10306195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT scanners: do benefits outweigh question of costs?
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 10306186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The real world of hospital finance, 3: Is new technology being made a scapegoat?
    Rosenberg CL
    Med Econ; 1978 Mar; 55(6):174-80, 185-6, 191-4. PubMed ID: 10306998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CAT scanners and cost containment.
    Alexander LL; Alexander GA
    Urban Health; 1978; 7(6):10, 21. PubMed ID: 10308714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HEW asks full proof of efficacy, cost effectiveness of scanners.
    Foley HA
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10306188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CAT scanners don't hike costs, declares study.
    Purch Adm; 1978 Mar; 2(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10307991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAT scanners--conferring "the greatest benefit on mankind".
    Relman AS
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov; 301(19):1062-3. PubMed ID: 114832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lifesavers a costly dilemma.
    Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Jan; 20(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10306263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAT scanners: the Swedish experience.
    Jonsson E; Marké LA
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1977; 2(2):37-53. PubMed ID: 10309095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blue Cross seeking adequate data on cost, efficiency of CT scanners.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):31. PubMed ID: 10306192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GAO: halt federal rush to buy CT scanners.
    Purch Adm; 1978 Aug; 2(7):14. PubMed ID: 10307996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating new technology without going broke.
    Starr C
    State Health Care Am; 2002; ():29-34. PubMed ID: 12235761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT--how many ways should you slice it? Why 64 slices may be more than you need.
    ECRI Institute
    Health Devices; 2007 Apr; 36(4):107-23. PubMed ID: 17555165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital consolidation yields small overall cost savings.
    Schwartz WB
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1981 Feb; 6(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 10317049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nader group, study give different views on medical scanners.
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Jan; 82(1):11. PubMed ID: 10306422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in CT service.
    Marsh J; Hoffman T
    Adm Radiol; 1987 Oct; 6(10):45-6. PubMed ID: 10312261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT decision: to buy.
    Mosher CL
    Trustee; 1977 Feb; 30(2):24. PubMed ID: 10305786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acquisition of CAT scanners in Canada.
    Fagan A
    Dimens Health Serv; 1977 Sep; 54(9):10-2. PubMed ID: 409639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tempest over CT--technology on the hot seat.
    Knaus WA
    Am Med News; 1978 Feb; 21(9):suppl 5, suppl 8. PubMed ID: 10306519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multislice CT service--cost versus revenue.
    Sanders B
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 12510611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.