These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10306801)
1. U.S. planning is a model for Canada. Chenoy N Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Apr; 20(4):51, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10306801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health Systems Agency and State Agency reviews of the appropriateness of existing institutional health services and of proposed new institutional health services. Fed Regist; 1978 May; 43(95):21273-82. PubMed ID: 10307351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health systems agencies and state health planning and development agencies: proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist; 1978 Mar; 43(53):11229-41. PubMed ID: 10307339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Most feel HSAs can't handle new regulations. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1978 Jul; 8(7):13-4. PubMed ID: 149233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Current trends in health planning re: Public law 93--641. Schklar R J Tenn Med Assoc; 1979 Jul; 72(7):522-4. PubMed ID: 491573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health planning chief foresees more support for planning process. Cain HP Hospitals; 1978 Mar; 52(5):54-7. PubMed ID: 624536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Appropriateness Review: the law and the challenge. Edwards B Tex Hosp; 1980 Jun; 36(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 10273206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health planning in Alaska: a historical review and a new law (PL 96-79). Brownsberger K; Chase L Alaska Med; 1979 Nov; 21(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 583539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CON regs hand HSAs a 'loaded gun'. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1980 Dec; 10(12):31-2. PubMed ID: 10249155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Health systems agency and state agency reviews of the appropriateness of existing institutional health services: Public Health Service, HEW. Final regulations. Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(239):71754-73. PubMed ID: 10273172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Planning Act: a new testing ground for state vs. federal control. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1976 Aug; 9(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 10246678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Certificate of need. Harris S J Am Health Care Assoc; 1981 Jan; 7(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10273240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are health planners using standards in lieu of judgment? Wolper LF Hosp Prog; 1978 Jun; 59(6):16, 19, 26. PubMed ID: 649123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health care in Newark: the regional health planning council HSA. Urban Health; 1978 Dec; 7(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10277922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health planning: progress, prospects, and issues. Klarman HE Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1978; 56(1):78-112. PubMed ID: 247197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do the recently enacted federal guidelines for health planning affect state and local health planning standards? Higgins DB Hosp Forum; 1978; 21(1):38, 35. PubMed ID: 10307584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal court grants summary judgment in Huron Valley case. Saylor LJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jan; 10(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 10284027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right of public access to information submitted under the requirements of the Health Planning Act. Bloom A Public Health Rep; 1977; 92(5):411-3. PubMed ID: 910016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]