These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10307049)
21. New health planning guidelines: the implications for group practice. Cain H Group Pract; 1978; 27(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 10306214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Planning: what now? A look at how state planning is going. Ellet V Provider; 1987 Dec; 13(12):12-3. PubMed ID: 10312299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. How do the recently enacted federal guidelines for health planning affect state and local health planning standards? Higgins DB Hosp Forum; 1978; 21(1):38, 35. PubMed ID: 10307584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. An analysis of appropriateness review. Marshall DA Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Apr; 5(2):7-29. PubMed ID: 10315365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Health planning. Pennington DW Ohio State Med J; 1979 May; 75(5):324-5. PubMed ID: 111200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Some states center attention on certificate of need. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Apr; 12(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10324011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Health Systems Agency and State Agency reviews of the appropriateness of existing institutional health services and of proposed new institutional health services. Fed Regist; 1978 May; 43(95):21273-82. PubMed ID: 10307351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. U.S. planning is a model for Canada. Chenoy N Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Apr; 20(4):51, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10306801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cooperatives on the moo-ve. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2005 Sep; 35(37):17. PubMed ID: 16224946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Antitrust and certificate of need: a doubtful prognosis. Campbell-Eaton M Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Aug; 7(6):5-35. PubMed ID: 10315684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A national look at CON laws. Kimmith DV Mich Hosp; 1989 Feb; 25(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 10291917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Appropriateness review: the next battleground. Weinstein SS Internist; 1981 Feb; 22(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10273257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Population problem, a planner's view. Chavan SB Yojana; 1983 Jan; 27(1-2):17-20. PubMed ID: 12311992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health planning--an overview. Richie ND Am J Health Plann; 1978 Apr; 3(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 10307190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minnesota hospitals challenge institution-specific health systems plan as de facto appropriateness review and taking property without compensation. Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Jul; 4(15):6-7. PubMed ID: 10278093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost issues underscore need for long-term planning to avoid "chaos". Webster SH Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):60. PubMed ID: 10267660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A model certificate of need statue. Cartaya OA; Curran WJ Health Care Manage Rev; 1977; 2(4):31-41. PubMed ID: 10305183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Perspectives. Trauma centers on a collision course. McCormick K Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(27):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10293730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]