BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10308657)

  • 1. They've developed a Texas-sized review program.
    Stacey J
    Am Med News; 1978 Aug; 21(32):11. PubMed ID: 10308657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Professional Standards Review Organization program.
    Nelson AR
    Conn Med; 1981 Jan; 45(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6785004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiences of the Texas PRO.
    Dunne PK; Martin J
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 3826092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. VA's PRO pilot project implemented in Texas.
    Miller E
    Tex Hosp; 1987 Jun; 43(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 10301657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent peer review often too costly for clients.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Jan; 20(2):34. PubMed ID: 10103437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Professionals serving professionals: AFMC working to help hone processes, improve care.
    Archer N
    J Ark Med Soc; 2006 Apr; 102(10):264-5. PubMed ID: 16619966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PSRO advisory groups.
    Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1977 Aug; 48(4):75-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 10305633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. After further review.... Texas IRO's can reverse bad calls by insurance companies.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):28-33. PubMed ID: 12674975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PSRO: involvement for nonphysician health-care providers.
    Watters HC; Hall RA
    Hosp Formul; 1977 Apr; 12(4):264-6. PubMed ID: 10305401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical Professional Standards Review Organization: designation of alternate.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(19):3795-7. PubMed ID: 10306146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sunset is golden opportunity to make changes at TSBME.
    Gold WS
    Tex Med; 1992 Sep; 88(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 1462273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statewide Professional Standards Review Councils: membership, organization, and duties of advisory groups.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(2):853-5. PubMed ID: 10306147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives. Physicians, consumers lock horns on peer review.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Apr; 41(17):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10281886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The PSRO physician adviser: who he is, what he does.
    Newmark G
    Hosp Med Staff; 1976 Dec; 5(12):8-11. PubMed ID: 10273024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PSRO: boon or bane? An opportunity.
    Platt KA
    Health Care Week; 1978 May; 1(44):9. PubMed ID: 10325005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting the public and assuring high practice and professional standards in the physician community: the Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline.
    Crausman RS
    Med Health R I; 2003 Sep; 86(9):279-81. PubMed ID: 14556411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 20-year experience with malpractice screening panels.
    Kridelbaugh WW; Palmisano DJ
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 May; 82(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10167808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PSRO: boon or bane? An insanity.
    Le Maitre G
    Health Care Week; 1978 May; 1(44):9. PubMed ID: 10307611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Despite White House hostility, peer review for doctors is moving ahead.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1983 Oct; 15(43):2168-9. PubMed ID: 10273401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PRO--physicians win preliminary challenges.
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Nov; 9(22):13-4. PubMed ID: 10278907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.