BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10308821)

  • 1. Switch to disposable drapes saves $100,000.
    Hosp Infect Control; 1979 Mar; 6(3):35. PubMed ID: 10308821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reusable linens prove cost effective.
    Purch Adm; 1978 Oct; 2(9):15. PubMed ID: 10308715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of the clinical effectiveness of surgical drapes.
    Lipp A
    Nurs Times; 2003 Dec 9-15; 99(49):28-31. PubMed ID: 14705343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Materials managers struggle with infection and cost control issues when buying linens.
    Litsikas M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1990 Jun; 15(6):13. PubMed ID: 10105189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost/benefit study of reusable and disposable OR draping materials.
    Murphy L
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1993 Apr; 11(3):44-8. PubMed ID: 10124965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel technique to decrease cost of surgical light handle covers.
    Brackeen AR; Butler D; Smith JL
    Dermatol Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):601-2. PubMed ID: 17451584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laundry manager tells of switch from disposables to reusables.
    Inguagiato A
    Laund News; 1979 May; 5(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 10242258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disposable versus reusable pillows: a case study.
    Grant P; Laird S; Coppage D
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1990 Feb; 11(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 10103647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disposable versus reusable linen: back to the future.
    Hayne AN
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1993 Feb; 14(3):1-11. PubMed ID: 10123399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reusable vs. disposable surgical textiles: another evaluation. American Reusable Textile Association.
    HPN Hosp Purch News; 1985 Feb; 9(2):14-8, 26. PubMed ID: 10271873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cost comparison of the use of textile surgical covers and disposable surgical covers in Mainz University Clinics].
    Rörig R
    Unfallchirurgie; 1982 Dec; 8(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 7164194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of disposable drapes in surgery and in obstetrics saves us 556 dollars and 81 cents monthly.
    Davis BT
    Hosp Manage; 1969 Apr; 107(4):86-91. PubMed ID: 5798072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reusable linens in the surgery.
    Powers T
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 Aug; 14(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10120043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: a case study.
    Baykasoğlu A; Dereli T; Yilankirkan N
    Am J Infect Control; 2009 Apr; 37(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 19216004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusable vs. disposable O.R. linen: which is really cheaper?
    Schmitz JW
    Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Aug; 8(8):3-6. PubMed ID: 10261669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A common sense approach to linen management.
    Butrymowicz G
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 Aug; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10120041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disposable linen items have hidden costs that include disposal, maintenance, labor.
    Levine S
    Laund News; 1986 Nov; 12(11):3. PubMed ID: 10279403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why we use reusable surgical packs.
    Christensen PL
    Text Rent; 1984 Feb; 67(6):30-4. PubMed ID: 10264867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
    MacLean C
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reusable textiles, with new look, make OR comeback.
    Patterson P
    OR Manager; 1994 Mar; 10(3):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10132538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.