BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10308826)

  • 21. Holding on whilst letting go: developing a comprehensive review process within a District health authority in order to measure success.
    Catchpole P
    Hosp Health Serv Rev; 1986 May; 82(3):106-8. PubMed ID: 10277091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring and validating a nurse's caring performance.
    Smith LS
    Adv Clin Care; 1990; 5(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2328068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why have an employee rating system?
    Gahagan DC
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Where did I go wrong?" Establishing a systematic evaluation process for career and organizational success.
    Lloyd JS
    Healthc Exec; 1987; 2(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 10301707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
    Grose LG
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two goals in every performance appraisal.
    Baker HK; Morgan PI
    Pers J; 1984 Sep; 63(9):74-8. PubMed ID: 10268092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Policy and procedure manual. Employee anecdotal record.
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1987; 9(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10284117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance appraisals can improve efficiency.
    Korneluk G
    Can Doct; 1982 Sep; 48(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 10257835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating personnel with automated management systems.
    Brady M
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Jul; 19(7):38-9. PubMed ID: 3386954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Value judgments in long-term care: a survey of NHAs (nursing home administrators).
    Hiller MD; Sugarman DB
    J Long Term Care Adm; 1988; 16(4):5-12. PubMed ID: 10312833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changing organizational culture.
    Riter RN
    J Long Term Care Adm; 1994; 22(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 10137997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new procedure in the evaluation of nursing aide applicants.
    Beach DA
    Nurs Homes Sr Citiz Care; 1988; 37(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10286297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. As resources shrink, evaluate personnel.
    Raab LC
    Contemp Adm Long Term Care; 1980 Dec; 3(12):16, 18. PubMed ID: 10295054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance appraisal: one company's experience.
    Birch WJ
    Pers J; 1981 Jun; 60(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 10251600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rating your CEO: a guide to effective evaluation.
    Moses RP
    Trustee; 1986 Oct; 39(10):11-4. PubMed ID: 10279148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The pitfalls of management by inference.
    Austin DL
    Pers J; 1978 Oct; 57(10):567-71, 581. PubMed ID: 10238553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Formulating usable objectives for manager performance appraisal.
    Allan P; Rosenberg S
    Pers J; 1978 Nov; 57(11):626-9, 640, 642. PubMed ID: 10239501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and implementation of a human accuracy program in patient foodservice.
    Eden SH; Wood SM; Ptak KM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1987 Apr; 87(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 3559010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.