These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10308837)

  • 1. NIH on electronic fetal monitoring.
    Sci News; 1979 Mar; 115(12):183. PubMed ID: 10308837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic fetal monitoring.
    Hurst M; Summey PS
    Health PAC Bull; 1979; (83-85):20-3. PubMed ID: 10242161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal monitoring held experimental technique.
    US Med; 1978 Dec; 14(24):10. PubMed ID: 10308791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On NICHD workshops I (1997) and II (2008) on electronic fetal monitoring.
    Harvey CJ; Witcher PS
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 38(3):255-7. PubMed ID: 19538611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fetal patient and the unwilling mother: a standard for judicial intervention.
    Hallisey PL
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Apr; 6(2):7-36. PubMed ID: 10265567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On NIH Workshop Report.
    Murray ML; Huelsmann GM; Mahlmeister L
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 38(1):4-5; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 19208042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ancillary services: guidelines issued for fetal monitor use.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Apr; 4(4):45-7. PubMed ID: 10273150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antenatal diagnosis. Sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, March 5-7, 1979.
    Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Summ; 1979; 2():11-5. PubMed ID: 398960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal monitors: hospitals continue use despite adverse reports.
    Stoltz MK
    Health Care Week; 1979 Jan; 2(28):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10323983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States in the 1980s.
    Albers LL; Krulewitch CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 8515931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Banta HD; Thacker SB
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Sep; 69(9):931-5. PubMed ID: 474850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NICHD Consensus Development Task Force Report. Predictors of intrapartum fetal distress: The role of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Zuspan FP; Quilligan EJ; Iams JD; van Geijn HP
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Oct; 23(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 513043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
    Vadnais MA; Golen TH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How lawyers have invaded the delivery room.
    Huber PW
    Med Econ; 1992 Dec; 69(23):149, 153-7, 160 passim. PubMed ID: 10122761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polemics in perinatology: the electronic fetal monitoring guidelines.
    Schifrin BS
    J Perinatol; 1990 Jun; 10(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 2358905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Documentation issues in electronic fetal monitoring.
    Rommal C
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1997; 17(2):27-34. PubMed ID: 10170196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, The Consensus Development Conference on Antenatal Diagnosis. Part III: predictors of fetal distress.
    Pediatr Ann; 1980 Jul; 9(7):276-8. PubMed ID: 7413282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congress debates fetal monitoring.
    Purch Adm; 1978 Jul; 2(6):9, 12. PubMed ID: 10307375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.