305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10308906)
21. The medical community looks at review.
Murchison GC
Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 4073392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Utilization review for Medicare. Is this a good use of nurses' time?
Snider ME
Am J Nurs; 1977 Jan; 77(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 319665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring quality: an imperative for ambulatory care.
Phillips L
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Jul; 14(7):3-4. PubMed ID: 10144658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. PSRO. Cost versus quality.
Himler G
N Y State J Med; 1979 Nov; 79(12):1863-5. PubMed ID: 292838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Massachusetts cost-effectiveness project: an experiment in cooperation.
Rogers AW
Perspect Medicaid Manage; 1979 Apr; ():35-45. PubMed ID: 10309123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Quality control à la Utah].
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1978 Apr; 720(17):575-6. PubMed ID: 306563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review.
Dittman DA
Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing quality of ambulatory care.
Williamson JW; Fahlauer CS; Gaiennie J; Smith CB
QA Rev; 1990 Apr; 2(3):8. PubMed ID: 10113746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The quandary of quality assessment.
McNerney WJ
Hosp Med Staff; 1977 May; 6(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 10273025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can PROs uncover quality concerns?
Magoffin CJ
Bus Health; 1986; 3(8):14-6. PubMed ID: 10300896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. PSROs: mechanism for quality assurance or cost containment?
Tabak MH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Dec; 4(12):15-6. PubMed ID: 104230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. PSROs: origins, directions, and changing assumptions.
Smits H
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7052174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute.
Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB
Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost containment and the link to quality.
VanderVeen LM
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1988 Jan; 6(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 10286008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mistakes happen. Improved processes mean fewer mistakes.
Bubin C
Ambul Outreach; 1999; ():23-6. PubMed ID: 10621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A retrospective and concurrent medical audit.
Knowlton HC
Hosp Prog; 1975 Jun; 56(6):68, 73, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 1168621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Can systems measure quality?
Christoffersson J; Moynihan C
Comput Healthc; 1988 Apr; 9(4):24, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10286359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tips on monitoring quality and outcomes in rehabilitation services.
Leiter P
AAPPO J; 1994; 4(2):31-8. PubMed ID: 10147205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ongoing quality of care reviews in shared health facilities: do they have an impact on care?
Stamm JB
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1981 Nov; 7(11):27-32. PubMed ID: 6801573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
