These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309272)

  • 1. A new approach to decision making for health care managers.
    Krasny J
    Health Manage Forum; 1980; 1(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 10309272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health economics: a framework for health service decision-making.
    Bowie RD
    N Z Med J; 1991 Mar; 104(907):99-102. PubMed ID: 1900927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritized list of health services in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Larijani B; Ameli O; Alizadeh K; Mirsharifi SR
    East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(2-3):367-71. PubMed ID: 11556025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priority setting in practice: what is the best way to compare costs and benefits?
    Wilson EC; Peacock SJ; Ruta D
    Health Econ; 2009 Apr; 18(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 18561215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Health economics play more and more important role in health care prioritization. Better utilization of the meager health care resources is the goal].
    Carlsson P; Anders A; Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Nov 15-21; 103(46):3617-20, 3622-3. PubMed ID: 17153871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Canadian Dietetic Association response to the Task Force on Allocation of Health Care Resources.
    Beatty D
    J Can Diet Assoc; 1985; 46(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 10271492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dilemma of decision.
    Derrick M
    Health Manage Forum; 1980; 1(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 10309271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An overheard conversation between Phaedrus (a clinician) and Communocrat (a community physician).
    N Z Med J; 1980 Apr; 91(657):263. PubMed ID: 6771725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods to establish priorities for health care.
    Duckett S
    Aust Health Rev; 1990; 13(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 10117322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's time to set national health care priorities.
    Kern WH
    Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Dec; 8(12):2-5. PubMed ID: 10309228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority-setting for healthcare: who, how, and is it fair?
    Menon D; Stafinski T; Martin D
    Health Policy; 2007 Dec; 84(2-3):220-33. PubMed ID: 17628202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Compulsory priorities in health care: knowledge and ethical analysis are needed for decisions about who will be favoured and who will not].
    Ostman O; Axelsson M; Nilstun T; Westrin G
    Lakartidningen; 1990 Nov; 87(48):4100, 4103-4. PubMed ID: 2263126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An economic approach to rationing health care resources.
    Hicks LL; Boles KE
    Case Stud Health Adm; 1985; 5():1-133. PubMed ID: 10313476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making in the National Health Service.
    Golding AM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jan; 288(6412):203-7. PubMed ID: 6419860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Prioritization of health services in Oregon--what can we learn?].
    Hansson LF; Ruyter KW; Lie RK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Nov; 111(28):3416-9. PubMed ID: 1792670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Should medical errors be avoided at any price?].
    Kristiansen IS
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Oct; 120(26):3178-83. PubMed ID: 11109368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses.
    NIHAE Bull; 1976; 9(3):166-8. PubMed ID: 829269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolving issues in laboratory management--a Canadian perspective: keeping a pulse on key issues in the Canadian laboratory industry.
    Cruickshank CA
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2000; 14(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 11793527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(47):2254-8. PubMed ID: 12481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biggest bang for the buck or bigger bucks for the bang: the fallacy of the cost-effectiveness threshold.
    Birch S; Gafni A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16378532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.