99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309428)
1. Legal approaches to genetic diagnosis and counselling.
Dickens BM
Health Law Can; 1980; 1(2):25-7, 37. PubMed ID: 10309428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrongful birth and informed consent: Reed v. Campagnolo.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 12159831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Wrongful birth litigation and prenatal screening.
Pioro M; Mykitiuk R; Nisker J
CMAJ; 2008 Nov; 179(10):1027-30. PubMed ID: 18981444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing for genetic traits: the need for a new legal doctrine of informed consent.
Cooper EB
MD Law Rev; 1999; 58(2):346-422. PubMed ID: 11660778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent ten years later: the impact of Reibl v. Hughes.
Robertson G
Can Bar Rev; 1991 Sep; 70(3):423-47. PubMed ID: 12211262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Fitness" for birth and reproduction: legal implications of genetic screening.
Annas GJ; Coyne B
Fam Law Q; 1975; 9(3):463-89. PubMed ID: 11664499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimizing the liability risks of genetic counseling.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(5):313. PubMed ID: 2507854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpractice arbitration: is it really binding?
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1978 Oct; 52(19):46, 51, 54 passim. PubMed ID: 689617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to treatment.
Rozovsky LE
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1973 Jun; 11(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 11664282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The injury of birth: Minnesota's statutory prohibition of postconception negligence actions.
McAfee PA
William Mitchell Law Rev; 1988; 14(3):701-58. PubMed ID: 11650185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal norms relevant to the practice of human genetics: a background paper.
Robertson G; Miller J; Howell T; Penney S
Health Law J; 1995; 3():187-211. PubMed ID: 10569875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal liability in genetic screening genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis.
Wright EE; Shaw MW
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Dec; 24(4):1133-49. PubMed ID: 7037253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Structuring the issues in informed consent.
Somerville MA
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal questions nurses ask.
Rozovsky LE
Dimens Health Serv; 1977 Mar; 54(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 838197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A paralyzing presumption.
Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
Can Doct; 1987 Dec; 53(12):GP3-5. PubMed ID: 10285186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
