286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309760)
1. $2 billion spent on systems, but hospitals still dissatisfied.
Dorenfest SI
Mod Healthc; 1982 Nov; 12(11):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10309760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Our system is comprehensive, but not complex.
Goodyear RR
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):49-50, 54. PubMed ID: 10311202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the microcomputer-based cost system.
McClymonds B; Howard P
Comput Healthc; 1985 Jul; 6(7):18-24. PubMed ID: 10271766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Choosing among data management vendors.
Kownacki W
Health Cost Manage; 1985; 2(6):5-12, 26. PubMed ID: 10311472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to select and implement case-mix (product-line analysis) systems.
Barnard C
Hosp Forum; 1985; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 10310939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Software primer. Information processing standards.
Beach LM
Inf Manage; 1984 Feb; 18(2):30, 32. PubMed ID: 10278221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Debate rages: is VA computer program an alternative to commercial software?
Barkholz D
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(5):46-8. PubMed ID: 10278317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing a database management system for decision support.
Cunningham L; Heinrich L; Hoit J
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):34-6. PubMed ID: 10311201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Community hospitals' spending up 16.7% for computer services.
Dorenfest SI
Mod Healthc; 1985 Sep; 15(19):92-8. PubMed ID: 10272892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Case mix management systems.
Bates SW; Hamilton RA; Clark JD
Mich Hosp; 1984 Aug; 20(8):24-9. PubMed ID: 10310720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Healthcare CEOs and CFOs report on vendor problems.
Walker L
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Mar; 2(3):56, 58. PubMed ID: 10270200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Best overall performance. The HIS awards.
Grams RR
Comput Healthc; 1985 Mar; 6(3):27-8. PubMed ID: 10270066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Department systems: review both the system and the vendor to avoid costly mistakes.
Stewart J
Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10278372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Micro users must meet rigid guidelines to tap data bases.
Yanish D
Mod Healthc; 1984 Aug; 14(10):106-8. PubMed ID: 10267479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Postinstallation evaluation of computerized management support systems.
Dove HG
J Ambul Care Manage; 1985 Aug; 8(3):59-66. PubMed ID: 10271935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of bar coding will expand if consensus occurs on codes.
Siegner CA
Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 10274878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital of the month. Parkview Hospital.
Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1985 Apr; 29(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 10272008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sophisticated new software can slash hospital materials cost.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Jun; 14(8):140-2. PubMed ID: 10278250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial automation of the hospital pharmacy: is it enough?
Shehan NE
Comput Healthc; 1985 Jun; 6(6):17-8. PubMed ID: 10311117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Planning for information systems in small or rural hospitals.
Booth B; DeSalvo CP
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 10300246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
