218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309828)
1. New directions in health care financing.
Robbins V
JEMS; 1982 Sep; 7(9):45-53. PubMed ID: 10309828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DRGs--the shape of things to come.
Murray RE
OH; 1983 Mar; 27(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 10309831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Selected results from an evaluation of the New Jersey Diagnosis-Related Group System.
May JJ; Wasserman J
Health Serv Res; 1984 Dec; 19(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 6438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is compression occurring in DRG prices?
Lave JR
Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 3159670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DRGs: the state of the art of reimbursement for nursing services.
Joel LA
Nurs Health Care; 1983 Dec; 4(10):560-3. PubMed ID: 6419180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DRGs and RIMs: implications for nursing.
Joel LA
Nurs Outlook; 1984; 32(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 6420778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the top down.
Goldstein JR
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 10310341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective payment gets mixed reviews in N.J.
Lefton D
Am Med News; 1982 Nov; 25(43):1, 11-2. PubMed ID: 10309788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. All New Jersey hospitals switch to diagnosis-related reimbursements.
Med World News; 1982 Feb; 23(3):30, 37-8. PubMed ID: 10309535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Some savings seen, but jury still out on Jersey DRG plan.
McLeod D
Bus Insur; 1983 Feb; 17(7):3, 32. PubMed ID: 10325062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective reimbursement: its effects on discharge planning services.
Cahill TF
Disch Plann Update; 1982; 3(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 10309906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Senator: planned DRG freeze could thaw.
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1985 Apr; 9(4):1, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10325093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Case-based payment systems: eight indicators to watch.
Connor RA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1982; 27(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 10309561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of DRG payment on New Jersey hospitals.
Hsiao WC; Dunn DL
Inquiry; 1987; 24(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 2958411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The DRG experience in New Jersey.
Todd JM
Mo Med; 1984 Jul; 81(7):408-10, 412. PubMed ID: 6433160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective payment: the case for case mix.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Jul; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10309699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary: DRG--New Jersey and the federal system.
Rineberg BA
J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 6433024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the bottom up.
Boyd EW
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 10310342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Getting a perspective on prospective reimbursement.
Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Sep; 8(9):3-7. PubMed ID: 10310180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. D.C. District Court invalidates federal DRG "experiment" in New Jersey.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):3-4. PubMed ID: 10310071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
