These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309919)

  • 1. U.S. can learn from NJ experiment.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1983 Mar; 13(3):80. PubMed ID: 10309919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. D.C. District Court invalidates federal DRG "experiment" in New Jersey.
    Peterson RN
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):3-4. PubMed ID: 10310071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The DRG experience in New Jersey.
    Todd JM
    Mo Med; 1984 Jul; 81(7):408-10, 412. PubMed ID: 6433160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective payment: the case for case mix.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Jul; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10309699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective payment gets mixed reviews in N.J.
    Lefton D
    Am Med News; 1982 Nov; 25(43):1, 11-2. PubMed ID: 10309788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: DRG--New Jersey and the federal system.
    Rineberg BA
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 6433024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Getting a perspective on prospective reimbursement.
    Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Sep; 8(9):3-7. PubMed ID: 10310180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the bottom up.
    Boyd EW
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 10310342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the top down.
    Goldstein JR
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 10310341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective reimbursement: its effects on discharge planning services.
    Cahill TF
    Disch Plann Update; 1982; 3(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 10309906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective payment system.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some savings seen, but jury still out on Jersey DRG plan.
    McLeod D
    Bus Insur; 1983 Feb; 17(7):3, 32. PubMed ID: 10325062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New directions in health care financing.
    Robbins V
    JEMS; 1982 Sep; 7(9):45-53. PubMed ID: 10309828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DRGs: the state of the art of reimbursement for nursing services.
    Joel LA
    Nurs Health Care; 1983 Dec; 4(10):560-3. PubMed ID: 6419180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DRGs--the shape of things to come.
    Murray RE
    OH; 1983 Mar; 27(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 10309831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Case-based payment systems: eight indicators to watch.
    Connor RA
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1982; 27(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 10309561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: DRG--the executive director's view.
    Maressa VA
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):409-10. PubMed ID: 6433025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RIMs: when dreams finally become reality.
    Joel LA
    N J Nurse; 1983; 13(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 6415614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DRGs and RIMs: implications for nursing.
    Joel LA
    Nurs Outlook; 1984; 32(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 6420778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sophisticated clinical nursing key under DRG plan, says Joel.
    Joel L
    Am Nurse; 1984 Jan; 16(1):1, 18. PubMed ID: 6419653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.