140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10309994)
1. Unique services can aid understanding of DRG system.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 May; 8(5):66. PubMed ID: 10309994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. D.C. District Court invalidates federal DRG "experiment" in New Jersey.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):3-4. PubMed ID: 10310071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the basics of diagnosis-related groups.
Tideiksaar R
Physician Assist; 1984 Aug; 8(8):47-8, 52, 116. PubMed ID: 10310787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Some savings seen, but jury still out on Jersey DRG plan.
McLeod D
Bus Insur; 1983 Feb; 17(7):3, 32. PubMed ID: 10325062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences between the federal and New Jersey DRG systems.
Hub JR
Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Sep; 8(9):8. PubMed ID: 10310181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the top down.
Goldstein JR
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 10310341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives. Are DRGs effective?
Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 May; 38(19):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10310578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Facilitating the transition into financial management under DRG.
Cost Containment; 1983 May; 5(10):3-6. PubMed ID: 10310053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Organizing QA and UR activities under a DRG-based system.
O'Brien JR
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Sep; 9(9):276-7. PubMed ID: 6415572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A look at how New Jersey's DRG system is changing board roles.
Ewell CM
Trustee; 1984 Jan; 37(1):24, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10310366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DRG cost-per-case management. New breed of pacemaker vendors helps hospitals cut implant costs.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):158, 160. PubMed ID: 10310472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DRG cost-per-case management. Labs should try to cut patients' stay, market testing services.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):146, 148. PubMed ID: 10317429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital information systems: computers crank out DRG cost data, but how valid is information?
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1983 Sep; 13(9):160, 162, 164. PubMed ID: 10310203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. DRG opportunities knock for reference labs.
Brennan L
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Apr; 16(4):30-42. PubMed ID: 10310555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons from the New Jersey experience: from the bottom up.
Boyd EW
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 10310342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DRG dumping?
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(6):5. PubMed ID: 10311029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Capital costs, calculation of prices principal issues in DRG legislation.
Lefton D
Am Med News; 1983 Apr; 26(13):1, 15, 22. PubMed ID: 10310031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. All New Jersey hospitals switch to diagnosis-related reimbursements.
Med World News; 1982 Feb; 23(3):30, 37-8. PubMed ID: 10309535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The New Jersey DRG experience: success of failure?
Cost Containment; 1984 Jun; 6(11):3-6. PubMed ID: 10310647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DRG. Hospital organization improves.
Boerma H
Hospitals; 1983 Jan; 57(2):50, 59. PubMed ID: 6401258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
