384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310161)
1. TEFRA puts the squeeze on radiology.
Falck S
Appl Radiol; 1983; 12(4):19-22, 25. PubMed ID: 10310161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Speaking out: the new environment for radiology.
Neuhauser D
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(3):16, 23. PubMed ID: 10310645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DRG cost-per-case management. Cost-cutting drive tags imaging.
Kuntz EF
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):150, 152. PubMed ID: 10310470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A strategy for radiologists dealing with DRGs.
Deffebach RR; Moorefield JM
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 10310727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology practice under TEFRA and DRGs.
Breckenridge RL
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 10310298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology: before and after DRGs.
Conway JB
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 10310482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prospective payment systems on diagnostic imaging services.
Muilenburg RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Dec; 145(6):1122-3. PubMed ID: 3933289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective reimbursement--its impact on planning in radiology.
Osborn R
Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):3-7. PubMed ID: 10299801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Antitrust implications of "all-inclusive" payment methodologies: the Empire Blue Cross decision.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jun; 10(13):5-7. PubMed ID: 10282184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Capital costs and DRGs--caveat emptor!
Keefe J
Radiol Manage; 1984 Mar; 6(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10273493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective payment is here.
Yesukaitis DC
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 10310483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective payment system.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exclusive contracts: do they constrain competition?
McGraner RC
Radiol Manage; 1988; 10(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10302263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparability of radiology departments.
Conway JB
Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):14-20. PubMed ID: 10246476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parallel planning: a key to successful DRG phase-in management.
Keege J; Jollie W
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10310481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Executive address. Current state of the world as one of crisis.
St Leger M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):14, 62. PubMed ID: 10309860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Budget reconciliation implications explored.
Millman DS; Suldan JI
Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 10302335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative value accountability. "Fine tuning the 80's.".
Shapro HR
Adm Radiol; 1987 Jan; 6(1):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10281204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiology services on a tight budget.
MacEwan DW
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Jun; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7380875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
