BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310181)

  • 1. Differences between the federal and New Jersey DRG systems.
    Hub JR
    Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Sep; 8(9):8. PubMed ID: 10310181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facilitating the transition into financial management under DRG.
    Cost Containment; 1983 May; 5(10):3-6. PubMed ID: 10310053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial management and DRGs.
    Suver JD; Jessee WF; Zelman WN
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 10311404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Financial management issues. The DRG.
    Wilson CN
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Feb; 19(2):109, 112. PubMed ID: 10310459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning to live with DRGs: the New Jersey experience.
    Becker BL
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Jul; 15(7):35-41. PubMed ID: 10310249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New position for nurses--DRG coordinator.
    Rosselot T
    Kans Nurse; 1984 Apr; 59(4):15. PubMed ID: 6425548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A DRG checklist.
    Weil TP
    South Hosp; 1984; 52(2):50, 52, 54 passim. PubMed ID: 10310484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ABCs of DRGs. Learning from New Jersey's early experience with DRGs.
    Goldstein JR
    Issues Health Care; 1984; 5(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 10310764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DRG payments and net contribution variance analysis.
    Grimaldi PL
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 10315495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standard cost accounting: methods that can be applied to DRG classifications.
    Messmer VC
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Jan; 38(1):44-5, 48. PubMed ID: 10315488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaboration and cooperation: necessary and achievable.
    Nestler WB
    Internist; 1983 Aug; 24(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10310194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DRG and the hospital's reaction.
    Wilson CN
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Mar; 19(3):232, 234. PubMed ID: 10310551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospitals will fight biased DRG system.
    Johnson AN; Appel GL
    Mod Healthc; 1983 Jul; 13(7):192-4. PubMed ID: 10310088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financial results appear mixed in treating patients in DRG 127.
    Tatge M
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):86, 90. PubMed ID: 10310993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DRG strategies from the Big 8.
    Brennan L
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1985 Jan; 17(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10311089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Many hospitals report success in cutting DRG 106, 107 costs.
    Nathanson M
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):82-4. PubMed ID: 10310992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profitability of treating patients in DRG 182 varies for hospitals.
    Richman D
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):92-4. PubMed ID: 10310994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis related groups: recent developments and their adaption and application in Australia.
    Palmer G; Wood T
    Aust Health Rev; 1984; 7(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 10310729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges in capital funding in a DRG environment.
    Knell ED
    Issues Health Care; 1984; 5(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10310767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many hospitals report problems cutting DRG 89 treatment costs.
    Punch L
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):76-8. PubMed ID: 10310991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.