230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310183)
1. DRG transition period is the new math for hospitals.
Lee SW
Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Sep; 2(9):117-9. PubMed ID: 10310183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Expert says new DRG bill will not change admitting procedures.
Allen M
Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Apr; 2(4):51-2. PubMed ID: 10309937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HHS will watch admissions for DRG 'gamers'.
Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Aug; 2(8):97-9. PubMed ID: 10310311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using medical records to ensure fair DRG reimbursement.
Ray WJ; Johnstone J
Comput Healthc; 1983 Dec; 4(12):32-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10310306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DRG cost-per-case management. Cost-cutting drive tags imaging.
Kuntz EF
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):150, 152. PubMed ID: 10310470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Volunteer services: a way to ease the DRG crunch.
Beckham S
Perioper Nurs Q; 1985 Sep; 1(3):29-38. PubMed ID: 2412220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DRGs highlight need for timely patient discharges.
Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Sep; 2(9):109-11. PubMed ID: 10310182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining a contribution margin for DRG profitability.
Kohlman HA
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Apr; 38(4):108, 110. PubMed ID: 10315522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Speaking out: the new environment for radiology.
Neuhauser D
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(3):16, 23. PubMed ID: 10310645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Practicing pathology in New Jersey.
Harrer WV
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):557-9. PubMed ID: 10310297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control points in patient accounting.
Beal D
Patient Acc; 1988 Feb; 11(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 10288752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gaining control of the uncontrollable in preadmissions.
Rode D
Healthc Financ Manage; 1990 Apr; 44(4):15. PubMed ID: 10145230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. . . .of interest to smaller hospitals.
Carothers LD
Tex Hosp; 1979 Mar; 34(10):50-2. PubMed ID: 10240714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. TEFRA puts the squeeze on radiology.
Falck S
Appl Radiol; 1983; 12(4):19-22, 25. PubMed ID: 10310161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate medical records to have key impact on hospitals in a DRG case mix system.
MacDonald E
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):55-8, 61-4. PubMed ID: 10309845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathology practice under TEFRA and DRGs.
Breckenridge RL
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 10310298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A strategy for radiologists dealing with DRGs.
Deffebach RR; Moorefield JM
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 10310727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Front door cost containment.
Hartmann P
Nurs Success Today; 1985 Oct; 2(10):32-8. PubMed ID: 3854455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient education and DRGs: an administrative perspective.
Johnson DA; Grubb A
Patient Educ Newsl; 1984 Jun; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 10310630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk/cost analysis of equipment in a mixed regulatory/competitive environment.
Keefe J
Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):18-21. PubMed ID: 10310924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
