BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310216)

  • 1. The word processing evaluation process.
    Tegen AV
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 10310216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cost-effective radiology reporting system.
    Kolodny GM
    Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(4):61, 63-4. PubMed ID: 10309537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Department systems: review both the system and the vendor to avoid costly mistakes.
    Stewart J
    Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10278372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology information system--let's phase it.
    Hanwell L; Hartman P
    Radiol Manage; 1982 Sep; 4(4):2-7. PubMed ID: 10309800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical/ancillary systems.
    Odell MG
    Top Health Care Financ; 1978; 4(4):31-42. PubMed ID: 109945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing the right information system for your hospital.
    Sceider RM; Abrami PF
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jun; 39(6):44-6. PubMed ID: 10271426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing office automation: a behavioral perspective.
    Wygonik EJ
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):12-21. PubMed ID: 10311360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A medical information system -- seven years later.
    Fleming JJ
    Hosp Forum; 1979; 22(6):8, 10-2. PubMed ID: 10309021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information systems--the systems need some solutions.
    Friedman E
    Hospitals; 1982 May; 56(9):70-1, 74, 78-80. PubMed ID: 7061088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word processing for the medical record department and beyond.
    Salazar R
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 10310218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-based laboratory information systems.
    Dayhoff RE; Miller RE
    Clin Lab Med; 1981 Mar; 1(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 6809395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Providing access to clinical information.
    Fischer G
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Aug; 38(8):26-7, 30. PubMed ID: 10315583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computers in anatomic pathology.
    Aller RD
    Clin Lab Med; 1983 Mar; 3(1):133-47. PubMed ID: 6340930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating process control with the hospital information system: a laboratory model.
    Marks OJ; Bienstock M
    Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(4):50-2, 55-6. PubMed ID: 10273973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information systems: the single versus multiple vendor.
    Kennedy OG
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Dec; 39(12):80, 94. PubMed ID: 10274487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Departmental computer systems--reevaluating the issues of control.
    Silverman MR
    Comput Healthc; 1986 Sep; 7(9):49-52. PubMed ID: 10277456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The computer is coming--what should I do?
    Priest SL; O'Sullivan VJ
    Health Care Superv; 1983 Jul; 1(4):75-94. PubMed ID: 10278185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Database lab systems come of age at Skokie Valley.
    Goldman EJ
    Comput Healthc; 1983 Sep; 4(9):24-6, 30. PubMed ID: 10262194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing among data management vendors.
    Kownacki W
    Health Cost Manage; 1985; 2(6):5-12, 26. PubMed ID: 10311472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A success story: expanding system capabilities through interfacing.
    Spaziano R; Bradley E
    Comput Hosp; 1982; 3(4):48-50, 52. PubMed ID: 10255899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.