321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310238)
1. A quality control program for a high volume outpatient medical record department.
Lisbin SJ; Van Kuran L
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Oct; 54(10):18-21. PubMed ID: 10310238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Product management spurs emphasis on medical records.
Fox LA; Tucker J
Hospitals; 1985 Mar; 59(5):92, 94. PubMed ID: 3972372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. St. Joseph's Hospital gears up for the future.
Upton B
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Mar; 60(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 6832524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical records: a new challenge under prospective DRG reimbursement.
Ryckman D; Sourapas JK
Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(3):47-58. PubMed ID: 3920786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A focused approach to coding quality control.
Green DK
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control of diagnosis and procedure coding.
Thompson BJ; Loup RJ
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):46-55. PubMed ID: 10265591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assessment: monitoring and evaluating medical record documentation and services.
Curtis EH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10294810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental health record section meeting focuses on quality.
Hostetler D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 May; 57(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10276717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Components and requirements of a QA program for the medical record service.
Finnegan R
Med Rec News; 1979 Apr; 50(2):12, 14-22. PubMed ID: 10241438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Making medical record review objective and effective.
Smith CJ
Med Rec News; 1979 Aug; 50(4):74-9. PubMed ID: 10243256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Setting the stage for improved record content.
Freeman TJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 May; 55(5):41-3. PubMed ID: 10310611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considering qualitative standards for health care data.
Sheehy KH
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):31-7. PubMed ID: 10309863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tucker explains audit of medical record department.
Tucker J
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Apr; 3(4):53-5. PubMed ID: 10307592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of PAS abstracting methods.
Goodell S
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):17-26. PubMed ID: 10309948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical record department performance: an increasing concern.
Murphy-Muth SM; Lonergan KM
Top Health Care Financ; 1983; 10(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 6419388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Report of a continuous quality improvement program in a tertiary-care medical center.
Stern Z; Rotem O; Wolfenson M; Gedalia N; Adato-Levy R; Mor-Yosef S
Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1996; 4(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 10159301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the medical record credential on data quality.
Green E; Benjamin C
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):29-38. PubMed ID: 10280223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. LINC: a model outpatient record quality control program.
Eichhorst C
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 May; 57(5):24-6. PubMed ID: 10276718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Record monitoring with a personal computer.
Ekstrand NA
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Apr; 55(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 10310534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Attributes of healthcare productivity standards.
Kahl K; Krajnak G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 May; 57(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 10276716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
