These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310307)
1. The issue of feeding: it is the most troubling of the life support questions. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(6):42-3. PubMed ID: 10310307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Have courts taken legal risk from feeding refusals? Burda D Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(11):36. PubMed ID: 3084375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three state courts decide cases on removal of artificial feeding devices. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1986 May; 9(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10311543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Life support issues: is involvement of the court required? Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(1):94, 97-8. PubMed ID: 10265082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding and withdrawing artificial feeding: the role of the living will. Healey JM Conn Med; 1985 Nov; 49(11):765. PubMed ID: 3933905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The life support cases: a court update on the feeding issue. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1985; 18(3):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10311118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration in Connecticut. The case of Carol McConnell. Healey JM Conn Med; 1988 Nov; 52(11):691. PubMed ID: 3148387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions on food and fluid in life-sustaining measures: part II. Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1984 Jul; 15(7):54-6. PubMed ID: 6431343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal implications of nutrition support. The state of the law. Dacso ST; Justice P Ala J Med Sci; 1987 Jul; 24(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 3116874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Chicago commission speaks out on nutrition and hydration. Health Prog; 1987 Dec; 68(10):35-6, 68. PubMed ID: 10312336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New Jersey's 'right-to-die' cases: a view from the ring. Nevins M Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986 Mar; 6(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10311536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Law for the nurse manager. Decisions on food and fluid in life-sustaining measures. Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1984 Jun; 15(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 6429587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Carla Myers case decided in Ohio. Hosp Ethics; 1993; 9(4):5. PubMed ID: 10183892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial nutrition for the terminally-ill patient--an ethical issue. Showalter JS Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(15):21-4. PubMed ID: 10311623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Update: the removal of life supports in long-term care facilities. Robbins DA J Long Term Care Adm; 1985; 13(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10270754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NJ Supreme Court rules on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(16):6-8. PubMed ID: 10282651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decisions at the end of life: the legacy of Karen Ann Quinlan. Healey JM Conn Med; 1985 Aug; 49(8):549. PubMed ID: 4028719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]