These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310307)

  • 21. The Conroy decision.
    Maressa VA
    N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):957-8. PubMed ID: 3866979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changing the rules on dying.
    McIntyre RL
    N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):945-8. PubMed ID: 3866976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The feeding dilemma: In the Matter of Conroy.
    Plumeri PA
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1985 Aug; 7(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 3930597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The meaning of the Conroy decision.
    Rothberg H
    N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):954-5. PubMed ID: 3866978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The ethics of providing life-sustaining nutrition and fluids to incompetent patients.
    Barry R
    J Fam Cult; 1985; 1(2):23-37. PubMed ID: 11649793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quinlan case set pace for bioethics debate.
    Hospitals; 1985 Aug; 59(15):36-7. PubMed ID: 4018757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Big brother at the bedside.
    Nevins MA
    N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):950-2. PubMed ID: 3866977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. After Conroy: 'When is enough enough'?
    Swick T
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1985; 5(7):14-5. PubMed ID: 10272592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985).
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Catholic positions on withholding sustenance for the terminally ill.
    McCartney JJ
    Health Prog; 1986 Oct; 67(8):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The implications of withdrawing nutritional devices.
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Feb; 84(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 6421160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. California court rules on patient's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 10270264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Criminal prosecution for discontinuance of life support--Part IV.
    Gargaro WJ
    Cancer Nurs; 1984 Feb; 7(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 6559097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Responding to parental requests to forego pediatric nutrition and hydration.
    Johnson J; Mitchell C
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 11056868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality improvement in parenteral nutrition care.
    Font-Noguera I; Cercós-Lletí AC; Llopis-Salvia P
    Clin Nutr; 2001 Feb; 20(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 11161548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cancer nursing and the law. Criminal prosecution for discontinuance of life support--Part II.
    Gargaro WJ
    Cancer Nurs; 1983 Jun; 6(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 6552938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Law: extension of life.
    Finch J
    Nurs Mirror; 1983 Apr; 156(14):30. PubMed ID: 6551884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
    Ashby M; Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Florida court rules on feeding devices.
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Jul; 9(7):14. PubMed ID: 10311912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.