245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310329)
1. Prospective payment and malpractice: can higher quality be consistent with lower costs?
Braganza KE; Simmons LP
Mich Hosp; 1983 Dec; 19(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 10310329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The prospective payment alternative.
Haug JN; Chupack NK
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Apr; 68(4):9-14. PubMed ID: 10309903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Baring costs. How the DRG system works.
Kotelchuck R
Health PAC Bull; 1984; 15(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 10310617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The DRG challenge is to ensure quality.
Heinz J
Provider; 1986 Jun; 12(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 10311563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PPS and quality care: can they coexist?
Vladeck BC
Healthspan; 1986 Jan; 3(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10311449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical appraisal of the DRG system. Problem areas for DRG reimbursement in the U.S.A.
Harper DL
Aust Health Rev; 1985; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10311188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unanswered questions facing DRG's.
Pettingill BF; Westell HC
Hosp Top; 1984; 62(4):3-5. PubMed ID: 10310696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lawmakers focus on hospital-DRG squeeze.
Baldwin MF
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(7):54-8. PubMed ID: 10311030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Nov; 39(46):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10311364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DRGs: reflections on the past and a look ahead. Interview by Paul C. Gerber.
Averill RF
Physicians Manage; 1985 Nov; 25(11):150-3, 156-60. PubMed ID: 10311356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring cost and quality of care under prospective reimbursement.
Mushlin AI
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jun; 13(6):17-21. PubMed ID: 10273559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of care--physician's beacon.
Smith DA
Pa Med; 1986 Apr; 89(4):10. PubMed ID: 3085051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness, quality seen as goals for technology in DRG system.
Olseth DR; Sutherland DC; Miller G
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 10310590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Most administrators fear care quality will be hurt by prospective payment.
Jackson B; Jensen J
Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(15):108-10. PubMed ID: 10273601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost containment (DRGs): a new source for litigation?
Zaremski M; Rehm J
Health Matrix; 1985; 3(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 10311246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Court of Appeals holds district court had no jurisdiction to award prospective relief.
Duffy EJ
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):9-11. PubMed ID: 10300786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legislative currents: Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC).
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Mar; 56(3):28. PubMed ID: 10311082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. PPS discharges: premature or appropriate?
Simmons SW
Mich Hosp; 1986 Feb; 22(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 10275635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lessons in balancing cost and quality.
Miccio BL
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 10273595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care leaders point to flaws in HHS payment plan.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 Mar; 8(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10309991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
