477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310470)
1. DRG cost-per-case management. Cost-cutting drive tags imaging.
Kuntz EF
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):150, 152. PubMed ID: 10310470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Speaking out: the new environment for radiology.
Neuhauser D
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(3):16, 23. PubMed ID: 10310645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. TEFRA puts the squeeze on radiology.
Falck S
Appl Radiol; 1983; 12(4):19-22, 25. PubMed ID: 10310161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A strategy for radiologists dealing with DRGs.
Deffebach RR; Moorefield JM
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 10310727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the radiology department trim costs with two management tools.
Conine TA; Aders DM
Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Sep; 34(9):28-31, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10248664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost containment through information management.
Bauman RA
Appl Radiol; 1985; 14(1):19, 21. PubMed ID: 10300041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equipment leasing. A guide for lessees.
Stewart D
Adm Radiol; 1990 Feb; 9(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 10104276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accounting methods in radiation oncology. Case level cost determination.
Sternick E
Adm Radiol; 1990 Jun; 9(6):58-62, 64. PubMed ID: 10105306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparability of radiology departments.
Conway JB
Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):14-20. PubMed ID: 10246476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of case-based payment for inpatient radiology, anesthesia, and pathology services.
Mitchell JB; Rosenbach ML
Inquiry; 1989; 26(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 2533172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective reimbursement--its impact on planning in radiology.
Osborn R
Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):3-7. PubMed ID: 10299801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospects for increasing the accessibility of MRI.
Kaufman L; Crooks L; Arakawa M; Hoenninger J; Watts J; Winkler M
Adm Radiol; 1987 Nov; 6(11):32-4, 36-8. PubMed ID: 10285607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Parallel planning: a key to successful DRG phase-in management.
Keege J; Jollie W
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10310481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative value accountability. "Fine tuning the 80's.".
Shapro HR
Adm Radiol; 1987 Jan; 6(1):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10281204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The radiation oncology production process model.
Sternick ES
Adm Radiol; 1987 Oct; 6(10):35-7. PubMed ID: 10284780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Controlling clinical equipment maintenance costs.
Bluemke DH
Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10293539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing DRGs: knowing what to cut--and when.
Keefe J; Dubé P; Jollie W
Radiol Manage; 1983 Sep; 5(4):2-6. PubMed ID: 10310300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
Glaser SM; Dehn TG
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DRG transition period is the new math for hospitals.
Lee SW
Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Sep; 2(9):117-9. PubMed ID: 10310183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
