301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310554)
1. Meet the DRG adjusters.
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Apr; 16(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 10310554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DHHS + DRG = prospective reimbursement.
Weller A
Pathologist; 1982 Dec; 36(12):646-7. PubMed ID: 10310094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives. Prospective payment: DRG era dawns.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Sep; 37(35):4p. PubMed ID: 10310221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Capital costs, calculation of prices principal issues in DRG legislation.
Lefton D
Am Med News; 1983 Apr; 26(13):1, 15, 22. PubMed ID: 10310031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a DRG system in your future?
Zannoth D
Mich Med; 1983 Apr; 82(19):238. PubMed ID: 6408354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'DRG-only' rule too late to block most Medicare waivers to states.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1982 Nov; 12(11):16-7. PubMed ID: 10309758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HCFA facing growing opposition to DRG weight cuts.
Lesparre M
Hospitals; 1984 Sep; 58(17):32-3. PubMed ID: 6432673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare DRG price blend to change soon.
Grimaldi PL
Nurs Manage; 1984 Jul; 15(7):57-9. PubMed ID: 6431344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Senator: planned DRG freeze could thaw.
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1985 Apr; 9(4):1, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10325093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An overview of DRG regulations--the impact of changing reimbursement patterns.
Morgan LB; Kappel CA
Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 3920783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. D.C. District Court invalidates federal DRG "experiment" in New Jersey.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):3-4. PubMed ID: 10310071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective payment plan advances.
Lefton D
Am Med News; 1983 Mar; 26(10):1, 9. PubMed ID: 10310030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective payment regulations.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Nov; 54(11):64-6. PubMed ID: 10310285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Payment by diagnosis: US government proposes new fee system.
Korcok M
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Apr; 128(7):833-5, 838. PubMed ID: 6403213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective payment laws: implications.
Murphy E
Todays OR Nurse; 1984 Apr; 6(4):30. PubMed ID: 6426101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective payment and due process: a need to fill the void.
Weissburg C; Tichon MJ
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):75-6, 78. PubMed ID: 10309848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis related groups: their role in the reimbursement system.
Merrill JC
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1984 Jun; 60(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 6428494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislative currents: an approach to prospective payment to hospitals.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 10309867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. A revolution called DRGs: 1983 in review.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Dec; 37(50):suppl 6p. PubMed ID: 10310407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A bold step forward.
Davis CK
Internist; 1983 Aug; 24(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 10310199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
