BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310645)

  • 21. Radiology: before and after DRGs.
    Conway JB
    Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 10310482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Economics as an aid to decision making within diagnostic imaging departments.
    O'Shea E
    Radiography; 1987; 53(611):222-4. PubMed ID: 3120237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of prospective payment systems on diagnostic imaging services.
    Muilenburg RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Dec; 145(6):1122-3. PubMed ID: 3933289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost containment through information management.
    Bauman RA
    Appl Radiol; 1985; 14(1):19, 21. PubMed ID: 10300041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiologic information management systems. System costs and savings.
    Choplin RH; Boehme JM; Park WC; Maynard CD; Williams RC
    Appl Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-9, 33. PubMed ID: 10286573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to "price" X rays.
    Groth CD
    Med Group Manage; 1980; 27(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 10247673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controlling clinical equipment maintenance costs.
    Bluemke DH
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10293539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk/cost analysis of equipment in a mixed regulatory/competitive environment.
    Keefe J
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):18-21. PubMed ID: 10310924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost effectiveness: radiologic services.
    Lucas SJ
    Ohio State Med J; 1979 May; 75(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 111190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiologists mobilize against DRGs.
    Herman JG
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):119-25. PubMed ID: 10310874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How much is quality assurance costing your department?
    Paleen R; Skundberg PA; Schwartz H
    Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 10291949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nonionic contrast agents: clinical and cost considerations.
    Wolf G
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 10311703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
    Glaser SM; Dehn TG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DRG transition period is the new math for hospitals.
    Lee SW
    Hosp Admitting Mon; 1983 Sep; 2(9):117-9. PubMed ID: 10310183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Capital costs and DRGs--caveat emptor!
    Keefe J
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Mar; 6(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10273493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economics as a tool in managerial decision making.
    Hayes TJ
    Radiol Manage; 1979; 2(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 10244739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reducing the photographic budget in the imaging department. 3--From Kenya.
    Odindo R
    Radiography; 1985; 51(596):75-6. PubMed ID: 3991885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology.
    Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Uhde A; Aslaksen A
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug; 8(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 3139411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiology services on a tight budget.
    MacEwan DW
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Jun; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7380875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.