380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310655)
1. Concurrent medical record analysis in a community hospital.
Lee MP
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jun; 55(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 10310655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent chart analysis and DRG assignment in a prospective payment environment.
Shlala TJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):34-40. PubMed ID: 10312715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review ensures quick response to faulty care.
Sherber J
Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(15):55-7. PubMed ID: 7390465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
Faust BL; Speck CC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient assessment in symphony.
Simonides D
Comput Healthc; 1987 Nov; 8(13):48-50. PubMed ID: 10284459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing concurrent review coding problems.
Bulatow NL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):36-8. PubMed ID: 10287422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making medical record review objective and effective.
Smith CJ
Med Rec News; 1979 Aug; 50(4):74-9. PubMed ID: 10243256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Prado D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):24-33. PubMed ID: 10287421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities. Part 2.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Pardo D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):25-37. PubMed ID: 10312524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Employee level productivity reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):34-40. PubMed ID: 10292963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review for the medical record professional.
Brewer E; Kluck E; Susala K; Nohos J
Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 10246931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring laboratory services through concurrent review.
McManus CD; Smalley DL; Sanders DE
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Feb; 8(2):5-9. PubMed ID: 6803214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical record consultants: valuable members of the small hospital team.
Duelm LC
Tex Hosp; 1980 Jun; 36(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10247013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A face sheet documentation monitoring system in a medical record department.
Bissonette G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Sep; 6(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10272565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical record productivity standards: one hospital's response.
Ladwig JP
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Sep; 5(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10268135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A quality assurance program in action.
Ladwig JP
Med Rec News; 1979 Apr; 50(2):13, 22-7, 30-4. PubMed ID: 10241439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing documentation guidelines?
Koepke M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):38-40. PubMed ID: 10310978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The development and implementation of a drug utilization review program.
Lazor-Bajcar JM; Fowler R
Can J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10286608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Setting the stage for improved record content.
Freeman TJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 May; 55(5):41-3. PubMed ID: 10310611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical management analysis system: a professional liability warning mechanism.
Craddick JW
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Apr; 5(4):2-8. PubMed ID: 121411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
