176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310838)
1. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
Nevins MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy.
Burt RA
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients?
Lo B; Dornbrand L
Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
Ackerman JW; Pope MC
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the matter of Claire C. Conroy.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3850083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients?
Emanuel EJ
Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Terminating life support for mentally retarded, critically ill patients: the prosecutor's perspective.
Nesbitt JB
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 6981678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985).
Devlin MM
J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
