These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310853)

  • 1. Legislative currents: defining PRO responsibilities.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Oct; 55(10):24-7. PubMed ID: 10310853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HCFA official outlines PRO program objectives.
    Morford T
    Hospitals; 1987 Aug; 61(15):122. PubMed ID: 3596537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A PRO report card.
    Webber AH
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10301023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New PRO director seeking advice to improve program.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Oct; 16(22):36-7. PubMed ID: 10301090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New PRO contracts fuel debate.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1986 Apr; 27(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10276403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 8 senators oppose overhaul of PRO system.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Apr; 22(14):4. PubMed ID: 10117266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blizzard of paperwork, new rules are burying PROs and hospitals.
    Baldwin MF; Fackelmann KA
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(1):46-50, 54. PubMed ID: 10300520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fla. Blues seek deal to serve as PRO for '92.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(7):6. PubMed ID: 10116247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicare HMO/CMP review slated to begin Apr. 1.
    Firshein J
    Hospitals; 1986 Dec; 60(23):61. PubMed ID: 3536721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Weiser RR
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives. PROs: modification and expansion.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Aug; 39(33):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10300446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PROs shift toward quality as HMO review nears.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1986 Dec; 27(24):46-8, 53-9. PubMed ID: 10279842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospitals, HCFA clash over PRO quotas.
    Finn J
    Hospitals; 1984 Sep; 58(17):32. PubMed ID: 6540750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PRO scrutiny means more hospital involvement. Interview by Myk Cherskov.
    Dehn T
    Hospitals; 1987 Mar; 61(6):103-4. PubMed ID: 3546060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives. Peer review program takes shape.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Sep; 37(37):4p. PubMed ID: 10273400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PROs are determined to do more than HCFA requires.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 Sep; 8(9):109-12. PubMed ID: 10273391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looking for changes in retroactive HCFA directives.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Dec; 95(12):38. PubMed ID: 1461663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PROs in transition.
    Bomberger I
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10278605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HCFA grants rare plea to extend pact.
    Gardner E
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Nov; 21(45):12. PubMed ID: 10114671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.