BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310966)

  • 1. Perspectives. Capital under DRGs.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Jan; 39(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10310966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capital proposals more expensive, ICF study finds.
    Traska MR
    Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(12):26, 28. PubMed ID: 3519423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HHS' capital plan arouses provider anxieties.
    Firshein J
    Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(12):24, 26. PubMed ID: 3519422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building debate over hospitals.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1986 Jun; 18(24):1505. PubMed ID: 10300862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare payment for capital.
    Kovener RR; Herr WW
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1990; 23(3):12, 14-6. PubMed ID: 10106713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capital budgeting under DRGs. Meeting a new challenge.
    Kee RC; Grant EW
    OH; 1984; 28(7):10-3, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10310668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capital formation and DRGs.
    Raske KE; Wilson PA
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Oct; 19(10):15-7. PubMed ID: 10310397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suits over capital payments? Maybe..
    Burda D
    Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(12):31-2. PubMed ID: 3519425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quayle spurs capital payment reform. Interview by Michael Lesparre.
    Quayle D
    Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(3):62-3. PubMed ID: 3510959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Congress wants to legislate Medicare capital payment cuts.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Mar; 16(7):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 10300618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The debate over capital costs.
    Robinson ML
    Healthspan; 1986 Mar; 3(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 10300722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New rates published. $1.5-billion saving sought from DRGs.
    McIlrath S
    Am Med News; 1983 Sep; 26(34):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 10325072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DRGs: a medical records perspective.
    Bennett SP
    Nurs Health Care; 1984 Jun; 5(6):337-9. PubMed ID: 6429580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal implications of the DRGs.
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1985 Jul; 16(7):17-9. PubMed ID: 3925397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives. Prospective payment: DRG era dawns.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Sep; 37(35):4p. PubMed ID: 10310221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of capital payment options under Medicare prospective payment. An ECRI technology management assessment.
    J Health Care Technol; 1986; 2(4):231-46. PubMed ID: 10300810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective capital payments to hospitals.
    Anderson G; Ginsburg PB
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1983; 2(3):52-63. PubMed ID: 6418631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New legal issues for hospitals.
    Pies HE
    OH; 1983 Aug; 27(8):7-10. PubMed ID: 10310209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How nurses are learning to live with DRG's.
    Uroservich P
    Nurs Life; 1984; 4(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 6424070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social justice and the interim regs.
    Curtin L
    Nurs Manage; 1983 Nov; 14(11):7-8. PubMed ID: 6422365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.