164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310990)
1. DRG management. More hospitals turn to SOIs, but experts question their usefulness.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):63-4, 69-75. PubMed ID: 10310990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate medical records to have key impact on hospitals in a DRG case mix system.
MacDonald E
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):55-8, 61-4. PubMed ID: 10309845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation between inpatient diagnostic and billing codes: the principal diagnosis.
Siemon JE
Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Jun; 2(4):67-76. PubMed ID: 10309647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of case mix.
Bentley JD; Butler PW
Top Health Care Financ; 1982; 8(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 6805091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Severity index applied to DRGs accounts for sicker patients.
Horn S
Hospitals; 1982 Dec; 56(24):37. PubMed ID: 6815050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical records. Experts: more research needed to set value of code programs.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1985 Jun; 15(13):98, 102. PubMed ID: 10311136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coding and DRG changes.
Finnegan R
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):23. PubMed ID: 10312523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. SuperPRO DRG validation process.
Barnes CA
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 10311650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond first-generation coding systems.
Demuth AI
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Sep; 57(9):50-1. PubMed ID: 10311679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DRG cost-per-case management. New breed of pacemaker vendors helps hospitals cut implant costs.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):158, 160. PubMed ID: 10310472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DRG cost-per-case management. Task forces scour diagnosis, therapy methods for cost-cutting procedures.
Kuntz EF
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):138, 142. PubMed ID: 10310469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Preparing for case mix: the role of data processing.
Barnard C
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Jun; 37(6):57-70. PubMed ID: 10315350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DRG cost-per-case management. Nutrition support can trim stays.
Punch L
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):164. PubMed ID: 10310473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Using QA monitors for DRG management.
Bartek W
Tex Hosp; 1984 May; 39(12):10. PubMed ID: 10310633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. System needs severity index: researcher.
Am Med News; 1983 Apr; 26(15):9. PubMed ID: 10309972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DRG cost-per-case management. 'Double-dipping' can hike profits, but advantages may be short-lived.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):154, 156. PubMed ID: 10310471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DRG cost-per-case management. Labs should try to cut patients' stay, market testing services.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):146, 148. PubMed ID: 10317429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Poor diagnosis, poor treatment. How the DRG system affects hospitals that serve the poor.
Kotelchuck R
Health PAC Bull; 1985; 16(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10311123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital information systems: computers crank out DRG cost data, but how valid is information?
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1983 Sep; 13(9):160, 162, 164. PubMed ID: 10310203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Many hospitals report success in cutting DRG 106, 107 costs.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):82-4. PubMed ID: 10310992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
