244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10310992)
1. Many hospitals report success in cutting DRG 106, 107 costs.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):82-4. PubMed ID: 10310992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Many hospitals report problems cutting DRG 89 treatment costs.
Punch L
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):76-8. PubMed ID: 10310991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospitals will fight biased DRG system.
Johnson AN; Appel GL
Mod Healthc; 1983 Jul; 13(7):192-4. PubMed ID: 10310088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Profitability of treating patients in DRG 182 varies for hospitals.
Richman D
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):92-4. PubMed ID: 10310994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Financial management issues. The DRG.
Wilson CN
Hosp Pharm; 1984 Feb; 19(2):109, 112. PubMed ID: 10310459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis related groups: recent developments and their adaption and application in Australia.
Palmer G; Wood T
Aust Health Rev; 1984; 7(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 10310729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Financial results appear mixed in treating patients in DRG 127.
Tatge M
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):86, 90. PubMed ID: 10310993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Facilitating the transition into financial management under DRG.
Cost Containment; 1983 May; 5(10):3-6. PubMed ID: 10310053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A DRG checklist.
Weil TP
South Hosp; 1984; 52(2):50, 52, 54 passim. PubMed ID: 10310484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DRG payments and net contribution variance analysis.
Grimaldi PL
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 10315495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Standard cost accounting: methods that can be applied to DRG classifications.
Messmer VC
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Jan; 38(1):44-5, 48. PubMed ID: 10315488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The DRG and the hospital's reaction.
Wilson CN
Hosp Pharm; 1984 Mar; 19(3):232, 234. PubMed ID: 10310551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New position for nurses--DRG coordinator.
Rosselot T
Kans Nurse; 1984 Apr; 59(4):15. PubMed ID: 6425548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences between the federal and New Jersey DRG systems.
Hub JR
Hosp Purch Manage; 1983 Sep; 8(9):8. PubMed ID: 10310181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DRG strategies from the Big 8.
Brennan L
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1985 Jan; 17(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10311089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in capital funding in a DRG environment.
Knell ED
Issues Health Care; 1984; 5(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10310767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obtaining estimates of marginal cost by DRG.
Bridges JM; Jacobs P
Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Oct; 40(10):40-6. PubMed ID: 10311667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospitals getting ready for DRGs.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1983 Dec; 13(12):23, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10310330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital matrix management and DRG-based prospective payment.
McMahon LF; Fetter RB; Freeman JL; Thompson JD
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 10311403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
