These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311041)

  • 1. Perspectives. Severity of illness and hospital payment.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Mar; 39(10):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Teaching hospitals assess Medicare plan.
    New Physician; 1983 Jul; 32(7):24. PubMed ID: 10310560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital planning for profit. The importance of measuring severity of illness.
    Horn S
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Jan; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 3919602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor diagnosis, poor treatment. How the DRG system affects hospitals that serve the poor.
    Kotelchuck R
    Health PAC Bull; 1985; 16(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10311123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(161):48433-9084. PubMed ID: 18956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute-care hospitals: a decade of surprises (1983 to 1993).
    Ginzberg E
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1994; 71(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 8069277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare DRGs: facts and fallacies.
    Rajani K; Dally AD
    Wis Med J; 1983 Dec; 82(12):11-3. PubMed ID: 6420997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives. Public hospitals seek fiscal relief.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Oct; 37(39):Suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10310256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Major joint surgeries: a mixed bag under prospective payment.
    Nathanson M
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Sep; 14(12):38, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10310783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the effect of illness severity on revenue under DRGs.
    Brewster AC; Bradbury RC; Jacobs CM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):52-3, 56-60. PubMed ID: 10311153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of Medicare payment subsidies to teaching hospitals.
    Nicholson S
    LDI Issue Brief; 2001 Dec-2002 Jan; 7(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 12528656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does severity of illness make a difference in prospective payment?
    Horn SD
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 May; 37(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 10315319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital cost analysis.
    Butler JR
    Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1995; 3():vii-xxii, 1-393. PubMed ID: 10153084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DRGs must be changed to take patient's illness severity into account.
    Mendenhall S
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(15):86-8. PubMed ID: 10310919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare program; changes to the inpatient hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 1986 rates--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Jun; 50(111):24366-497. PubMed ID: 10311115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A plan to modify DRGs. Measuring severity of illness gives a truer prediction of costs for treating hospital patients.
    Horn SD
    Bus Health; 1985 Sep; 2(9):32-5. PubMed ID: 10311226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital DRGs: what do they mean for home care?
    Staebler R
    Caring; 1988 Feb; 7(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 10312421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost of complexity: the teaching hospital.
    Foley JK; Mulhausen RO
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(5):96-109. PubMed ID: 10311939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.