These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311118)
1. The life support cases: a court update on the feeding issue. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1985; 18(3):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10311118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withdrawing fluids and nutrition: an alternate view. Rosner F N Y State J Med; 1987 Nov; 87(11):591-3. PubMed ID: 3122129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawing nutritional life support: a constitutional right or murder? Cotton P Med World News; 1986 Feb; 27(3):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 10311452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Three state courts decide cases on removal of artificial feeding devices. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1986 May; 9(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10311543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Have courts taken legal risk from feeding refusals? Burda D Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(11):36. PubMed ID: 3084375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Feeding tube may not foster quality of life. Pasqua S Contemp Longterm Care; 1996 May; 19(5):98, 97. PubMed ID: 10157782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial nutrition for the terminally-ill patient--an ethical issue. Showalter JS Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(15):21-4. PubMed ID: 10311623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AMA stand on feeding tubes rapped, praised. Med World News; 1986 Apr; 27(8):28-9, 32. PubMed ID: 10311518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New Jersey's 'right-to-die' cases: a view from the ring. Nevins M Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986 Mar; 6(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10311536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law for the nurse manager. Decisions on food and fluid in life-sustaining measures. Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1984 Jun; 15(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 6429587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A challenge to examine the meaning of living and dying. Bresnahan JF; Drane JF Health Prog; 1986 Dec; 67(10):32-7, 98. PubMed ID: 10311789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Stinissen case for the last time? An analysis of the judgment by the Arnhem Court 10-31-'89]. van Eikema-Hommes GA TVZ; 1990 Feb; (4):104-5. PubMed ID: 2107819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A compelling state interest? Curtin LL Nurs Manage; 1989 Oct; 20(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 2511530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985). Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The legal dilemma of stopping artificial feeding. Blum JD Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1990; 7(3):42-8. PubMed ID: 2113822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Life support: sins of commission? Preston TA Med World News; 1986 May; 27(9):34. PubMed ID: 10311557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]