BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311162)

  • 1. Economic aspects of drug substitution.
    Salehi H; Schweitzer SO
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1985; 6(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10311162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prescription prices under the New York generic substitution law.
    Francetić I; Lasagna L; Weintraub M; Karch FE
    Ann Intern Med; 1980 Mar; 92(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 7356236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generic drugs and the prescribing physician.
    Nightingale SL; Morrison JC
    JAMA; 1987 Sep; 258(9):1200-4. PubMed ID: 3626003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generic script share and the price of brand-name drugs: the role of consumer choice.
    Rizzo JA; Zeckhauser R
    Int J Health Care Finance Econ; 2009 Sep; 9(3):291-316. PubMed ID: 19130220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential savings from generic prescribing and generic substitution in South Africa.
    Karim SS; Pillai G; Ziqubu-Page TT; Cassimjee MH; Morar MS
    Health Policy Plan; 1996 Jun; 11(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 10158460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost and price of comparable branded and generic pharmaceuticals.
    Bloom BS; Wierz DJ; Pauly MV
    JAMA; 1986 Nov; 256(18):2523-30. PubMed ID: 3773152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capitation payment for medicaid pharmacy services: impact on non-medicaid prescriptions.
    Lipson DP; Yesalis CE; Kohout FJ; Norwood GJ
    Med Care; 1981 Mar; 19(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 7012466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The generic prescribing issue.
    Brater DC; Pettinger WA
    Ann Intern Med; 1980 Mar; 92(3):426-7. PubMed ID: 7356238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generic substitution of antihypertensive drugs: does it affect adherence?
    Van Wijk BL; Klungel OH; Heerdink ER; de Boer A
    Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Jan; 40(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of prescription reimbursement methodologies in Japan and the United States.
    Akaho E; MacLaughlin EJ; Takeuchi Y
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2003; 43(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 12952317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential savings from substituting generic drugs for brand-name drugs: medical expenditure panel survey, 1997-2000.
    Haas JS; Phillips KA; Gerstenberger EP; Seger AC
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(11):891-7. PubMed ID: 15941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Society already achieves economic benefits from generic substitution but fails to do the same for therapeutic substitution.
    Gumbs PD; Verschuren WM; Souverein PC; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK; de Wit GA; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Nov; 64(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 17875197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The debate over substitution policy. Its evolution and scientific basis.
    Schwartz LL
    Am J Med; 1985 Aug; 79(2B):38-44. PubMed ID: 3898831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repackaged pharmaceuticals in the California workers' compensation system: from distribution and pricing options to physician and retail dispensing.
    Gitlin M; Wilson L
    Am J Ind Med; 2007 Apr; 50(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 17370319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of final short-fill rule on Medicare Part D costs and long-term care pharmacy dispensing.
    Bazalo G; Weiss RC
    Consult Pharm; 2012 Apr; 27(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 22498986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of generic drug competition on the price of prescription drugs in Ontario.
    Lexchin J
    CMAJ; 1993 Jan; 148(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8439888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drug utilization and cost in a Medicaid population: a simulation study of community vs. mail order pharmacy.
    Valluri S; Seoane-Vazquez E; Rodriguez-Monguio R; Szeinbach SL
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jul; 7():122. PubMed ID: 17663768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of economic effects of drug product selection legislation.
    Goldberg T; DeVito CA; Smith D; Stano M; Vidis JS; Moore WE; Dickson WM
    Med Care; 1979 Apr; 17(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 431151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The PRICE clinic for low-income elderly: a managed care model for implementing pharmacist-directed services.
    Stebbins MR; Kaufman DJ; Lipton HL
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 May; 11(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 15871644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug product selection in Illinois: the first year's experience.
    Stewart JE; Grussing PG; Purohit AA
    Med Care; 1982 Aug; 20(8):831-42. PubMed ID: 7109752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.