134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311417)
1. Tough HCFA, PRO scrutiny may hit hospitals with many DRG 88 cases.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10311417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Majority of hospitals consider DRG 104 to be a moneymaker.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):84. PubMed ID: 10317679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A hospital incentive payment system.
Owen JW
World Hosp; 1985 Nov; 21(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DRG dumping?
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(6):5. PubMed ID: 10311029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Autopsy diagnoses can increase DRG reimbursement.
Holmes J; Baer DM
Pathologist; 1986 Sep; 40(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10311733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IPPS FY'07 final rule contains 3-year phase-in for DRG cost weights, 3.4 percent payment increase.
Hosp Outlook; 2006; 9(3):1, 12. PubMed ID: 17128553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Senator: planned DRG freeze could thaw.
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1985 Apr; 9(4):1, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10325093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospitals, medical staffs will be in adversarial roles under PPS.
Johnson RL
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):69-70. PubMed ID: 10311415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The DRG system: an exercise in illogic and frustration.
Maurer R
Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1987 Sep; 31(6):20. PubMed ID: 10312291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Payment Error Prevention Program (PEPP): reducing Medicare payment errors in prospective payment system hospitals.
Bitonte DA; Curry P; Butler P; Nowak MJ; Jean-Baptiste R; Feigenbaum RA
Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 May; 21(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 11378983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is Medicare's prospective payment system sending patients home ready or not?
Jablonski DM
New Physician; 1985 Dec; 34(9):31-5. PubMed ID: 10311418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic prelude to prospective reimbursement by DRGs.
Lairson DR
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1985; 8(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 10311515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare's new payment plan: a mixed blessing.
Conrad DA; Omenn GS
Technol Rev; 1985; 88(8):50-1, 76. PubMed ID: 10317672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospitals look to "severity of illness" indexes.
Robinson ML
Healthspan; 1986 Jun; 3(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 10311627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The tip of the iceberg.
Ellstein CL
Mich Hosp; 1984 Aug; 20(8):15, 17. PubMed ID: 10310718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DRGs are not the answer.
Zenty TF
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(6):134-42. PubMed ID: 10311345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective payment and malpractice: can higher quality be consistent with lower costs?
Braganza KE; Simmons LP
Mich Hosp; 1983 Dec; 19(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 10310329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care leaders point to flaws in HHS payment plan.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 Mar; 8(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10309991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rural hospitals suffer prospective payment inequities.
Tauke TJ
Bus Health; 1985 May; 2(6):37-41. PubMed ID: 10311113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Answers to eight common questions about prospective pricing.
Trustee; 1983 Dec; 36(12):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 10310334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
