134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311417)
21. Some savings seen, but jury still out on Jersey DRG plan.
McLeod D
Bus Insur; 1983 Feb; 17(7):3, 32. PubMed ID: 10325062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. DRG based Medicaid systems offer options to improve reimbursement.
Bartlett L
Bus Health; 1985 Oct; 2(10):53-4. PubMed ID: 10311265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnosis-related group for burns ineffective, unfair, experts say.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):78, 82. PubMed ID: 10311416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Potential responses to the Medicare pricing mechanism.
Broyles RW; Rosko MD
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(3):70-82. PubMed ID: 10311507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Diagnosis-related patient groups].
Kozierkiewicz A
Kardiol Pol; 2008 Jun; 66(6):708-10; discussion 711. PubMed ID: 18626844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The switch to DRGs. Interview by Sharon Scanlon.
Rubin R
New Physician; 1985 Dec; 34(9):32-3. PubMed ID: 10311419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Severity of illness and DRG reimbursement.
Newman RG; Stefanu C; Chassie MB; Pate ML; Anderson RJ
Tex Med; 1986 Apr; 82(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 3085256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective pricing: a summary of key provisions of the law.
Hosp Manage Q; 1983; ():7-12. PubMed ID: 10310069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective pay for Medicare gets House nod.
Lefton D
Am Med News; 1983 Mar; 26(11):1, 9. PubMed ID: 10325065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Severity measures won't solve PPS problems.
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1986 Jul; 60(14):72. PubMed ID: 3087856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost control under the DRG system.
Helmi MA; Burton S
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1988; 33(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 10312525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups.
Baker JJ
J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 12079147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Major joint surgeries: a mixed bag under prospective payment.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Sep; 14(12):38, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10310783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. DRGs + complex caseload = trouble for children's hospitals.
Punch L
Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):62-6. PubMed ID: 10310826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The medical staff role under prospective pricing.
Landgarten S
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Feb; 13(2):3-10. PubMed ID: 10310571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The DRG challenge is to ensure quality.
Heinz J
Provider; 1986 Jun; 12(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 10311563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Group contends study proves DRGs won't work in psychiatric hospitals.
Fackelmann KA
Mod Healthc; 1985 Sep; 15(20):38. PubMed ID: 10311289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. PPS and quality care: can they coexist?
Vladeck BC
Healthspan; 1986 Jan; 3(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10311449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. DRG problems and potential.
Finkler SA
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1985; 8(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 10311513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
