These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311417)

  • 41. DRG payments and net contribution variance analysis.
    Soliman SY; Hughes WL
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Oct; 37(10):78-86. PubMed ID: 10315441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Test menus and profiles: signs of change under DRGs.
    Becker BL
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1985 Apr; 17(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 10317588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Technology, financing and rationing: where to from here in the DRG era?
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):12-3, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10310588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How to help your hospital survive.
    Goldsmith JC
    Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1985; 29(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 10311184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New HIMA chief favors moratorium on DRG changes to give system a chance to work.
    Samuel FE
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10310589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. ProPAC's first report proposes update, newer data base.
    Pathologist; 1985 Jun; 39(6):51-3. PubMed ID: 10311140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The impact of autopsy data on DRG reimbursement.
    Guariglia P; Abrahams C
    Hum Pathol; 1985 Dec; 16(12):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3934064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A DRG survival plan for the laboratory budget.
    Sharp JW
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Sep; 16(9):38-48. PubMed ID: 10317503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An empirical analysis of a DRG-based fixed payment system: the Georgia Alternative Reimbursement System.
    Skantz TR; Love DB
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 11(4):396-413. PubMed ID: 10313328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Payment for using new technologies. Why it's hard to find the essential information that you need.
    Health Technol; 1988; 2(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 10312482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medicare program; changes to the inpatient hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 1989 rates--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1988 Sep; 53(190):38476-640. PubMed ID: 10312706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Boards must adopt tough stance to meet demands of prospective pricing.
    McMahon A
    Trustee; 1984 Jan; 37(1):19-20, 23. PubMed ID: 10273444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How hospitals respond to changes in Medicare reimbursements.
    Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health; 2003; (5):2-3. PubMed ID: 15141687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New, innovative technologies help hospitals fight DRG squeeze.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):74, 76. PubMed ID: 10275219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. New HCFA rules may cut reimbursement up to 15% for outpatient services.
    ED Manag; 1999 Aug; 11(8):85-7. PubMed ID: 10539463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hospital billing and reimbursement: charging for inpatient nursing care.
    Welton JM; Harris K
    J Nurs Adm; 2007 Apr; 37(4):164-6. PubMed ID: 17415101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lingering side effects. DRG changes called positive but other woes remain.
    Barr P
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(33):17. PubMed ID: 16124723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reinvigorating the quality improvement incentives of hospital prospective payment.
    Iezzoni LI
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 19194335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.