BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311487)

  • 1. A hospital incentive payment system.
    Owen JW
    World Hosp; 1985 Nov; 21(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups.
    Baker JJ
    J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 12079147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rural hospitals suffer prospective payment inequities.
    Tauke TJ
    Bus Health; 1985 May; 2(6):37-41. PubMed ID: 10311113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital financial reimbursement reductions under Medicare.
    Wilson CN
    Hosp Pharm; 1985 Dec; 20(12):926-8. PubMed ID: 10311348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic prelude to prospective reimbursement by DRGs.
    Lairson DR
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1985; 8(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 10311515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential responses to the Medicare pricing mechanism.
    Broyles RW; Rosko MD
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(3):70-82. PubMed ID: 10311507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Medicare's prospective payment system sending patients home ready or not?
    Jablonski DM
    New Physician; 1985 Dec; 34(9):31-5. PubMed ID: 10311418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital management strategies for fixed-price payment.
    Smith CT
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1986; 11(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3081462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicare prospective payment for hospitals.
    Pitcher V
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Dec; 68(12):19-20, 38. PubMed ID: 10310302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Straight talk. New approaches in healthcare. Be aware: Medicare's Ambulatory Payment Classification poses significant risks in both lost revenue and noncompliance.
    van der Graf A; Lenahan M; Bohley MB; Armstrong CM; Bowers DL
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(17):41-4. PubMed ID: 12747131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prospective payment system for hospital reimbursement. Part II.
    Meadors AC; Wilson CN
    Hosp Admin Curr; 1985; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10311103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
    Atkinson G; Murray R
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DRG revisions: year III.
    Bartlett RL
    Mich Hosp; 1986 Jan; 22(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 10311410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Easing the impact. CMS blunts effect of new inpatient PPS.
    Lubell J
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Aug; 36(31):8-9. PubMed ID: 16958345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Executive summary of "The Report to Congress on Hospital Prospective Payment for Medicare".
    Schweiker SS
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Mar; 37(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 10315295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Nov; 39(46):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10311364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legislative currents: an approach to prospective payment to hospitals.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 10309867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis-related group for burns ineffective, unfair, experts say.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):78, 82. PubMed ID: 10311416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Payment Error Prevention Program (PEPP): reducing Medicare payment errors in prospective payment system hospitals.
    Bitonte DA; Curry P; Butler P; Nowak MJ; Jean-Baptiste R; Feigenbaum RA
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 May; 21(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 11378983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IPPS FY'07 final rule contains 3-year phase-in for DRG cost weights, 3.4 percent payment increase.
    Hosp Outlook; 2006; 9(3):1, 12. PubMed ID: 17128553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.