287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311544)
1. Response to environment changes and challenges.
Neill MJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Jun; 57(6):18-21. PubMed ID: 10311544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent chart analysis and DRG assignment in a prospective payment environment.
Shlala TJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):34-40. PubMed ID: 10312715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Prado D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):24-33. PubMed ID: 10287421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities. Part 2.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Pardo D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):25-37. PubMed ID: 10312524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
Faust BL; Speck CC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DRGs one year later.
Trussell N; Maddock V
South Hosp; 1984; 52(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 10310926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Review ensures quick response to faulty care.
Sherber J
Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(15):55-7. PubMed ID: 7390465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical records and the Middle East: a partnership in development.
Hostetler D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Jan; 57(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 10275062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical records departments face change.
Cost Containment; 1983 Nov; 5(21):3-6. PubMed ID: 10310261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical records program improves QA, RM, UR and cash flow.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Apr; 7(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 10254831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practice bulletin. Private review entities.
Glondys BA; Schraffenberger LA
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1987 Jun; 58(6):53-5. PubMed ID: 10282205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical records and DRGs.
Cofer J; Durkin E
Mich Hosp; 1983 Oct; 19(10):26-8. PubMed ID: 10310400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical records' new financial role dramatically shifts hospital priorities.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1983 Apr; 13(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 10309921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate medical records to have key impact on hospitals in a DRG case mix system.
MacDonald E
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):55-8, 61-4. PubMed ID: 10309845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Database applications in medical record management.
Waters K; Murphy G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1987 Jun; 7(4):18-29. PubMed ID: 10302445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring laboratory services through concurrent review.
McManus CD; Smalley DL; Sanders DE
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Feb; 8(2):5-9. PubMed ID: 6803214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preparing for prospective payment. Part II: Procedural preparation.
Flanagan JB; Sourapas KJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Dec; 54(12):20-2. PubMed ID: 10310351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The medical record practitioner--roles, image and influence.
Anderson S
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10310219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of PPS on medical record practitioners. Part II.
Bernstein TW
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Dec; 56(12):15-9. PubMed ID: 10311343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Louisiana survey: factors influencing the involvement of medical record department staff in quality assurance programs.
Peden AH
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):33-8. PubMed ID: 10309870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
