181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311627)
1. Hospitals look to "severity of illness" indexes.
Robinson ML
Healthspan; 1986 Jun; 3(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 10311627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Severity measures won't solve PPS problems.
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1986 Jul; 60(14):72. PubMed ID: 3087856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Severity of illness and DRG reimbursement.
Newman RG; Stefanu C; Chassie MB; Pate ML; Anderson RJ
Tex Med; 1986 Apr; 82(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 3085256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using medical records to ensure fair DRG reimbursement.
Ray WJ; Johnstone J
Comput Healthc; 1983 Dec; 4(12):32-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10310306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preparing for the future today--product line management. Interview by Sandy Downs.
Terenzio J
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Sep; 2(9):56-8. PubMed ID: 10311242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Computers and reimbursement.
Moliver M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Apr; 9(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10311611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DRG helper makes it easy for doctors to maximize reimbursement.
Hosp Forum; 1984; 27(4):62-3. PubMed ID: 10310692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does severity of illness make a difference in prospective payment?
Horn SD
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 May; 37(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 10315319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State effort to adjust DRGs for severity of illness could become national model.
Dine DD
Mod Healthc; 1988 Jul; 18(29):44-5. PubMed ID: 10312573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Majority of hospitals consider DRG 104 to be a moneymaker.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):84. PubMed ID: 10317679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DRG dumping?
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(6):5. PubMed ID: 10311029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The tip of the iceberg.
Ellstein CL
Mich Hosp; 1984 Aug; 20(8):15, 17. PubMed ID: 10310718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective payment and malpractice: can higher quality be consistent with lower costs?
Braganza KE; Simmons LP
Mich Hosp; 1983 Dec; 19(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 10310329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health care leaders point to flaws in HHS payment plan.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 Mar; 8(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10309991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rural hospitals suffer prospective payment inequities.
Tauke TJ
Bus Health; 1985 May; 2(6):37-41. PubMed ID: 10311113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Answers to eight common questions about prospective pricing.
Trustee; 1983 Dec; 36(12):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 10310334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tough HCFA, PRO scrutiny may hit hospitals with many DRG 88 cases.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10311417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A reality based system for pricing nursing service.
Trofino J
Nurs Manage; 1986 Jan; 17(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 3079895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The switch to DRGs. Interview by Sharon Scanlon.
Rubin R
New Physician; 1985 Dec; 34(9):32-3. PubMed ID: 10311419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective pricing: a summary of key provisions of the law.
Hosp Manage Q; 1983; ():7-12. PubMed ID: 10310069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
