BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311733)

  • 1. Autopsy diagnoses can increase DRG reimbursement.
    Holmes J; Baer DM
    Pathologist; 1986 Sep; 40(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10311733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How hospital medical record departments can benefit from retrospective DRG review.
    Small P
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 10113165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease.
    Assaf AR; Lapane KL; McKenney JL; Carleton RA
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(13):931-5. PubMed ID: 8361508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of self-adapting G-DRG system 2004 to 2006 on in-patient services payment in pediatric hematology and oncology patients of a university hospital].
    Christaras A; Schaper J; Strelow H; Laws HJ; Göbel U
    Klin Padiatr; 2006; 218(6):366-78. PubMed ID: 17080340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of autopsy data on DRG reimbursement.
    Guariglia P; Abrahams C
    Hum Pathol; 1985 Dec; 16(12):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3934064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of prospective payment under DRGs on the market value of hospitals.
    Folland S; Kleiman R
    Q Rev Econ Bus; 1990; 30(2):50-68. PubMed ID: 10113290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups.
    Baker JJ
    J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 12079147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tough HCFA, PRO scrutiny may hit hospitals with many DRG 88 cases.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10311417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
    Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost control under the DRG system.
    Helmi MA; Burton S
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1988; 33(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 10312525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of DRG targeting on the radiology department.
    McGraner RC
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Apr; 8(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 10312495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of flat-rate payment in radiation oncology. German experience with disease-related groups for inpatient funding in radiation oncology].
    Glocker S; Loskamp N; Bamberg M; Roeder N
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 16703284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Majority of hospitals consider DRG 104 to be a moneymaker.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):84. PubMed ID: 10317679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
    McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using an expert system to ensure accurate third-party reimbursement.
    Cohen RH
    Patient Acc; 1994 Sep; 17(9):2. PubMed ID: 10138287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The DRG system: an exercise in illogic and frustration.
    Maurer R
    Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1987 Sep; 31(6):20. PubMed ID: 10312291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IPPS FY'07 final rule contains 3-year phase-in for DRG cost weights, 3.4 percent payment increase.
    Hosp Outlook; 2006; 9(3):1, 12. PubMed ID: 17128553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rheumatologic treatment in the G-DRG system].
    Roeder N; Fiori W; Hülsemann JL; Könecke N; Lehmann H; Liman W; Lakomek HJ
    Z Rheumatol; 2004 Feb; 63(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14991277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.