344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311749)
1. Diagnosis related groups and the price of cost containment.
Sophy KG
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():305-26. PubMed ID: 10311749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective payment: a new direction for hospitals.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):24-6, 29-30, 33-4. PubMed ID: 10309843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital participation in alternative payment: developing a DRG-based system.
Ellstein C; Wheeler JR
Top Health Care Financ; 1986; 13(2):27-37. PubMed ID: 3101228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of hospital financial data.
Selke G
Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1986 Jun; 30(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10311633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential responses to the Medicare pricing mechanism.
Broyles RW; Rosko MD
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1986; 31(3):70-82. PubMed ID: 10311507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional responses to prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups. Implications for cost, quality, and access.
Stern RS; Epstein AM
N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):621-7. PubMed ID: 3919294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DRGs: a new era for health care.
Shaffer FA
Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 3138663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. DRGs being adopted by other insurers.
Wilson CN
Hosp Pharm; 1990 May; 25(5):482-3. PubMed ID: 10113208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does severity of illness make a difference in prospective payment?
Horn SD
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 May; 37(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 10315319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.
Mendenhall S
Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):62-8. PubMed ID: 10311154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital financial reimbursement reductions under Medicare.
Wilson CN
Hosp Pharm; 1985 Dec; 20(12):926-8. PubMed ID: 10311348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managers wanted. Case mix reimbursement demands managers, not facilitators.
Mannisto M
Hospitals; 1983 Mar; 57(6):91-3. PubMed ID: 6402443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. PPS and quality care: can they coexist?
Vladeck BC
Healthspan; 1986 Jan; 3(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10311449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-per-case reimbursement: a challenge to hospital management.
Bassett JG
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10310487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare prospective payment for hospitals.
Pitcher V
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Dec; 68(12):19-20, 38. PubMed ID: 10310302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HCFA pilot project may bolster hospital-physician collaboration.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1991 Apr; 65(8):49-50, 52. PubMed ID: 1901295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare payment and DRGs.
Lubaway WJ
Mich Hosp; 1983 Oct; 19(10):19-21. PubMed ID: 10310398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective pricing system, DRGs, and their impact on health care operations.
Mehra S
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1986; 9(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 10312032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The fact book on prospective payment. Health industry Manufacturers Association.
Med Prod Sales; 1983 Jun; 14(6):68-71, 94-103. PubMed ID: 10310091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
